From: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, arnd@arndb.de, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
will.deacon@arm.com, julien.thierry@arm.com,
ndesaulniers@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
thierry.reding@gmail.com, natechancellor@gmail.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: drop unnecessary WASM
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 08:58:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a23b99ac6319815dd23e2df4e4cd064@agner.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cdf451c0-3947-9be1-3bee-2366577c4c5f@arm.com>
On 06.03.2019 00:39, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On 2019-03-05 10:18 pm, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> The W macro for generating wide instructions when targeting Thumb-2
>> is not required for the preload data instructions (pld, pldw) since
>> they are only available as wide instructions. The GNU assembler seems
>> to work with or without the .w appended when compiling an Thumb-2
>> kernel. However, Clang's integrated assembler does not consider the
>> .w variants as valid instructions:
>>
>> ./arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h:133:5: error: invalid instruction
>> "pldw.w\t%a0 \n"
>> ^
>> <inline asm>:2:1: note: instantiated into assembly here
>> pldw.w [r0]
>> ^
>> 1 error generated.
>
> Have you filed a bug against Clang for that? Something like "pldwal.w"
> may be super-redundant, but it's still perfectly valid syntax. The
> "Standard assembler syntax fields" section of the Arm ARM even calls
> out that "...the .W qualifier has no effect" on ARM/A32 instructions
> since they are inherently 32-bit; that should equally apply for 32-bit
> only Thumb/T32 instructions. There are certainly a few instructions
> which don't allow a condition code (even "AL"), but off-hand I don't
> remember any not having the optional {<q>} field in their syntax.
Good point, bug filed:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40972
Will send a v2 and note that this is a work around for Clang and
reference the bug.
--
Stefan
>
> That said, obviously the patch itself is no problem since the syntax
> *is* redundant here, but it really is just a workaround for an
> assembler bug.
>
> Robin.
>
>> Drop the macro to make sure non-wide variants of pld and pldw are
>> emitted in all cases.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h
>> index 120f4c9bbfde..042d77cf686d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h
>> @@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ static inline void prefetchw(const void *ptr)
>> __asm__ __volatile__(
>> ".arch_extension mp\n"
>> __ALT_SMP_ASM(
>> - WASM(pldw) "\t%a0",
>> - WASM(pld) "\t%a0"
>> + "pldw\t%a0",
>> + "pld\t%a0"
>> )
>> :: "p" (ptr));
>> }
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-06 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-05 22:18 Stefan Agner
2019-03-05 22:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: drop -mauto-it Stefan Agner
2019-03-05 22:21 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-03-05 22:40 ` Stefan Agner
2019-03-05 23:20 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-03-05 23:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: drop unnecessary WASM Robin Murphy
2019-03-06 0:47 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-03-17 15:44 ` Stefan Agner
2019-03-06 7:58 ` Stefan Agner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1a23b99ac6319815dd23e2df4e4cd064@agner.ch \
--to=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome