mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Padhi, Beleswar" <b-padhi@ti.com>
To: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	"Mathieu Poirier" <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Fix usage of omap_mbox_message and mbox_msg_t
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 20:01:43 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a553f4f-9c36-472b-920b-281469659898@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904195634.2275867-2-afd@ti.com>


On 9/5/2026 1:26 AM, Andrew Davis wrote:
> The type of message sent using omap-mailbox is always u32. The definition
> of mbox_msg_t is uintptr_t which is wrong as that type changes based on
> the architecture (32bit vs 64bit). Make the type fixed to u32.
>
> This then means we need to fix the helper macro omap_mbox_message so it
> doesn't cast to u32 twice. What this macro should be doing is converting
> from the message type returned from the mailbox framework into the
> omap-mailbox type. When fixing this we should add a macro for the other
> direction (from omap-mailbox type to something that can be used with
> mbox_send_message).
>
> After these changes, make use of the new macros as appropriate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>


Thanks for cleaning this up. Test suite is happy.

Reviewed-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
Tested-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>

Thanks,
Beleswar

> ---
>   drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c | 10 +++++-----
>   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c    | 10 ++--------
>   include/linux/omap-mailbox.h         |  5 +++--
>   3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
> index 6ed0f28edac9c..efff95b8e363f 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
> @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ static void omap_rproc_mbox_callback(struct mbox_client *client, void *data)
>   						client);
>   	struct device *dev = oproc->rproc->dev.parent;
>   	const char *name = oproc->rproc->name;
> -	u32 msg = (u32)data;
> +	mbox_msg_t msg = omap_mbox_from_message(data);
>   
>   	dev_dbg(dev, "mbox msg: 0x%x\n", msg);
>   
> @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static void omap_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
>   	}
>   
>   	/* send the index of the triggered virtqueue in the mailbox payload */
> -	ret = mbox_send_message(oproc->mbox, (void *)vqid);
> +	ret = mbox_send_message(oproc->mbox, omap_mbox_to_message(vqid));
>   	if (ret < 0)
>   		dev_err(dev, "failed to send mailbox message, status = %d\n",
>   			ret);
> @@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ static int omap_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>   	 * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message
>   	 * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted.
>   	 */
> -	ret = mbox_send_message(oproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST);
> +	ret = mbox_send_message(oproc->mbox, omap_mbox_to_message(RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST));
>   	if (ret < 0) {
>   		dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed: %d\n", ret);
>   		goto put_mbox;
> @@ -777,13 +777,13 @@ static int _omap_rproc_suspend(struct rproc *rproc, bool auto_suspend)
>   	struct omap_rproc *oproc = rproc->priv;
>   	unsigned long to = msecs_to_jiffies(DEF_SUSPEND_TIMEOUT);
>   	unsigned long ta = jiffies + to;
> -	u32 suspend_msg = auto_suspend ?
> +	mbox_msg_t suspend_msg = auto_suspend ?
>   				RP_MBOX_SUSPEND_AUTO : RP_MBOX_SUSPEND_SYSTEM;
>   	int ret;
>   
>   	reinit_completion(&oproc->pm_comp);
>   	oproc->suspend_acked = false;
> -	ret = mbox_send_message(oproc->mbox, (void *)suspend_msg);
> +	ret = mbox_send_message(oproc->mbox, omap_mbox_to_message(suspend_msg));
>   	if (ret < 0) {
>   		dev_err(dev, "PM mbox_send_message failed: %d\n", ret);
>   		return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c
> index 3cb8ae5d72f67..4b6da3363f6c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ void k3_rproc_mbox_callback(struct mbox_client *client, void *data)
>   	struct k3_rproc *kproc = container_of(client, struct k3_rproc, client);
>   	struct device *dev = kproc->rproc->dev.parent;
>   	struct rproc *rproc = kproc->rproc;
> -	u32 msg = (u32)(uintptr_t)(data);
> +	mbox_msg_t msg = omap_mbox_from_message(data);
>   
>   	dev_dbg(dev, "mbox msg: 0x%x\n", msg);
>   
> @@ -94,15 +94,9 @@ void k3_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
>   {
>   	struct k3_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
>   	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> -	u32 msg = (u32)vqid;
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * Send the index of the triggered virtqueue in the mailbox payload.
> -	 * NOTE: msg is cast to uintptr_t to prevent compiler warnings when
> -	 * void* is 64bit. It is safely cast back to u32 in the mailbox driver.
> -	 */
> -	ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)(uintptr_t)msg);
> +	ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, omap_mbox_to_message(vqid));
>   	if (ret < 0)
>   		dev_err(dev, "failed to send mailbox message, status = %d\n",
>   			ret);
> diff --git a/include/linux/omap-mailbox.h b/include/linux/omap-mailbox.h
> index 3cc5c4ed7f5a6..e45f8c3841c23 100644
> --- a/include/linux/omap-mailbox.h
> +++ b/include/linux/omap-mailbox.h
> @@ -6,8 +6,9 @@
>   #ifndef OMAP_MAILBOX_H
>   #define OMAP_MAILBOX_H
>   
> -typedef uintptr_t mbox_msg_t;
> +typedef u32 mbox_msg_t;
>   
> -#define omap_mbox_message(data) (u32)(mbox_msg_t)(data)
> +#define omap_mbox_to_message(data) ((void *)(uintptr_t)(data))
> +#define omap_mbox_from_message(data) ((mbox_msg_t)(uintptr_t)(data))
>   
>   #endif /* OMAP_MAILBOX_H */

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-15 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-04 19:56 [PATCH 1/3] remoteproc: k3: Include what we need and only what we need Andrew Davis
2026-09-04 19:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Fix usage of omap_mbox_message and mbox_msg_t Andrew Davis
2026-09-09 15:48   ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-09-09 16:07     ` Andrew Davis
2026-09-15 14:31   ` Padhi, Beleswar [this message]
2026-09-04 19:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] remoteproc: Add compile testing for additional TI drivers Andrew Davis
2026-09-15 14:33   ` Padhi, Beleswar
2026-09-15 15:44     ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-09-15 14:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] remoteproc: k3: Include what we need and only what we need Padhi, Beleswar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1a553f4f-9c36-472b-920b-281469659898@ti.com \
    --to=b-padhi@ti.com \
    --cc=afd@ti.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®