mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@gmail.com>
To: "Miguel Botón" <mboton.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com,
	yi.zhu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iwlwifi: add power management support -v2
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:11:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ba2fa240711260911i705350f3hefeddc7a09f76d1a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711261718.14711.mboton@gmail.com>

On Nov 26, 2007 6:18 PM, Miguel Botón <mboton.lkml@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Saturday 17 November 2007 07:15:05 Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > Why power management shouldn't be enabled while in AC? The semantic of this
> > ioctls is quite unclear.
>
I
> IWL_POWER_AC and IWL_POWER_BATTERY are just two power modes. IWL_POWER_AC
> would be the default power mode when we're in AC (no power saving) and
> IWL_POWER_BATTERY would be the default power mode when we're in battery
> (power saving mode). That's why we set IWL_POWER_ENABLED flag with
> IWL_POWER_BATTERY, because it is the only power mode that saves power.
>
> We can change to IWL_POWER_BATTERY or IWL_POWER_AC in any moment.
>
> This patch, depending if power management is enabled or not, sets which power
> mode we should use, Then, it checks if we're already using this mode or not.
>
I'm not sure who introduced this names (lazy to look to history) but
that's very misleading. Nothing says that while in
AC we cannot do power saving and vice versa. This naming is scattered
all over the code, there should be only one place where AC and BATTERY
are  translated into appropriate (maybe configurable) power levels. We
have 5 power levels defined for iwlwifi.

Tomas

> --
>        Miguel Botón
>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-26 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-16 23:06 Miguel Botón
     [not found] ` <1ba2fa240711162215p30b8bc7fj9f36020378ff596a@mail.gmail.com>
2007-11-26 16:18   ` Miguel Botón
2007-11-26 17:11     ` Tomas Winkler [this message]
2007-11-26 17:14       ` Dan Williams
2007-11-26 17:33         ` Tomas Winkler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1ba2fa240711260911i705350f3hefeddc7a09f76d1a@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tomasw@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=mboton.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®