From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>,
"jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: core: use blk_mq_requeue_request in __scsi_queue_insert
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 10:17:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1bb1537c-3427-b56d-c296-aa9b101262e3@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq17eqvz1zn.fsf@oracle.com>
Hi martin
Thanks for your kindly response.
On 03/02/2018 09:43 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> Jianchao,
>
>> Yes, the block layer core guarantees that scsi_mq_get_budget() will be
>> called before scsi_queue_rq(). I think the full picture is as follows:
>
>> * Before scsi_queue_rq() calls .queuecommand(), get_device() is called for the
>> SCSI device and the device, target and host busy counters are incremented.
>> * If the SCSI core decides to requeue a command, scsi_queue_insert() causes
>> __scsi_queue_insert() to call scsi_device_unbusy(). That last function
>> decreases the device, target and host busy counters but not put_device(sdev).
>> Hence the need for a separate put_device() call after requeuing.
>>
>> It's unfortunate that the SCSI core became so asymmetric. Anyway,
>> since I am now convinced that this patch is correct, feel free to add:
>
> Please add something akin to Bart's explanation as a comment and repost.
yes, sure.
Thanks
Jianchao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-02 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-28 8:55 Jianchao Wang
2018-02-28 17:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-01 1:57 ` jianchao.wang
2018-03-01 17:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-02 1:43 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-03-02 2:17 ` jianchao.wang [this message]
2018-03-02 2:16 ` jianchao.wang
2018-03-02 1:44 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-03-02 2:18 ` jianchao.wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1bb1537c-3427-b56d-c296-aa9b101262e3@oracle.com \
--to=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®