From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>,
"jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: core: use blk_mq_requeue_request in __scsi_queue_insert
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 10:16:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c575c4d0-ee5a-6123-d44e-7be93650e3f4@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519926225.2675.6.camel@wdc.com>
Hi Bart
Thanks for your precious time and detailed summary.
On 03/02/2018 01:43 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Yes, the block layer core guarantees that scsi_mq_get_budget() will be called
> before scsi_queue_rq(). I think the full picture is as follows:
> * Before scsi_queue_rq() calls .queuecommand(), get_device() is called for the
> SCSI device and the device, target and host busy counters are incremented.
Supply some details here:
scsi_mq_get_budget before calling .queuecommand get_device and increase device_busy.
scsi_queue_rq increases target_busy and host_busy.
> * If the SCSI core decides to requeue a command, scsi_queue_insert() causes
> __scsi_queue_insert() to call scsi_device_unbusy(). That last function
> decreases the device, target and host busy counters but not put_device(sdev).
> Hence the need for a separate put_device() call after requeuing.
>
> It's unfortunate that the SCSI core became so asymmetric. Anyway, since I am
> now convinced that this patch is correct, feel free to add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Sincerely
Jianchao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-02 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-28 8:55 Jianchao Wang
2018-02-28 17:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-01 1:57 ` jianchao.wang
2018-03-01 17:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-02 1:43 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-03-02 2:17 ` jianchao.wang
2018-03-02 2:16 ` jianchao.wang [this message]
2018-03-02 1:44 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-03-02 2:18 ` jianchao.wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c575c4d0-ee5a-6123-d44e-7be93650e3f4@oracle.com \
--to=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®