From: "Wilczynski, Michal" <michal.wilczynski@intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <rafael@kernel.org>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
<lenb@kernel.org>, <dave.jiang@intel.com>, <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: NFIT: Fix local use of devm_*()
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 19:18:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c2117f1-2d22-4d08-bd9f-8c821d4a1757@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <652978deafdf8_f8792944c@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch>
On 10/13/2023 7:05 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> Wilczynski, Michal wrote:
>> On 10/13/2023 6:38 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> Michal Wilczynski wrote:
>>>> devm_*() family of functions purpose is managing memory attached to a
>>>> device. So in general it should only be used for allocations that should
>>>> last for the whole lifecycle of the device.
>>> No, this assertion is not accurate, if it were strictly true then
>>> devm_kfree() should be deleted. This patch is only a cleanup to switch
>>> the automatic cleanup pattern from devm to the new cleanup.h helpers.
>> The memory in question is only used locally in a function, so there is no reason
>> to use devm_*() family of functions. I think devm_kfree() is more for special
>> cases where the memory is meant to be used for the whole lifecycle of device,
>> but some special case occurs and it's not and it needs to be freed.
>>
>> This is an incorrect API usage. Would you propose to change all memory
>> allocations currently being done to devm_*() family simply because devm_kfree()
>> exists ?
> Michal, please work with someone else to get these cleanups upstream, I
> am done with this thread.
I'm really sorry if I offended you, I didn't mean to.
Michał
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-13 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-13 8:57 Michal Wilczynski
2023-10-13 16:38 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-13 17:00 ` Wilczynski, Michal
2023-10-13 17:05 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-13 17:18 ` Wilczynski, Michal [this message]
2023-10-13 21:20 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-14 10:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1c2117f1-2d22-4d08-bd9f-8c821d4a1757@intel.com \
--to=michal.wilczynski@intel.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®