From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com
Cc: willy@infradead.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
chrisl@kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, 21cnbao@gmail.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, shy828301@gmail.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
ioworker0@gmail.com, da.gomez@samsung.com, p.raghav@samsung.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] mm: vmscan: add validation before spliting shmem large folio
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 17:34:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c4e67f1-caf5-4913-857d-b9cfbc30321e@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03a7c798-7a0d-4873-8fcb-8940d8dadc00@redhat.com>
On 2024/8/8 16:51, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 08.08.24 04:36, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2024/8/7 23:53, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 07.08.24 09:31, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>>> Page reclaim will not scan anon LRU if no swap space, however
>>>> MADV_PAGEOUT
>>>> can still split shmem large folios even without a swap device. Thus add
>>>> swap available space validation before spliting shmem large folio to
>>>> avoid redundant split.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> mm/vmscan.c | 8 ++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>>>> index 31d13462571e..796f65781f4f 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>>>> @@ -1259,6 +1259,14 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct
>>>> list_head *folio_list,
>>>> }
>>>> } else if (folio_test_swapbacked(folio) &&
>>>> folio_test_large(folio)) {
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Do not split shmem folio if no swap memory
>>>> + * available.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (!total_swap_pages)
>>>> + goto activate_locked;
>>>> +
>>>> /* Split shmem folio */
>>>> if (split_folio_to_list(folio, folio_list))
>>>> goto keep_locked;
>>>
>>> Reminds me of
>>>
>>> commit 9a976f0c847b67d22ed694556a3626ed92da0422
>>> Author: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
>>> Date: Thu Mar 9 15:05:43 2023 -0800
>>>
>>> shmem: skip page split if we're not reclaiming
>>> In theory when info->flags & VM_LOCKED we should not be getting
>>> shem_writepage() called so we should be verifying this with a
>>> WARN_ON_ONCE(). Since we should not be swapping then best to
>>> ensure we
>>> also don't do the folio split earlier too. So just move the check
>>> early
>>> to avoid folio splits in case its a dubious call.
>>> We also have a similar early bail when !total_swap_pages so just
>>> move that
>>> earlier to avoid the possible folio split in the same situation.
>>>
>>>
>>> But indeed, pageout() -> writepage() is called *after* the split in the
>>> vmscan path.
>>>
>>> In that "noswap" context, I wonder if we also want to skip folios part
>>> of shmem
>>> with disabled swapping?
>>
>> Yes, I think so.
>>
>>>
>>> But now I am wondering under which circumstances we end up calling
>>> shmem_writepage() with a large folio. And I think the answer is the
>>> comment of
>>> folio_test_large(): via drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shmem.c.
>>>
>>>
>>> ... so if shmem_writepage() handles+checks that, could we do
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>>> index a332cb80e928..7dfa3d6e8ba7 100644
>>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>>> @@ -1257,11 +1257,6 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct
>>> list_head *folio_list,
>>> goto
>>> activate_locked_split;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> - } else if (folio_test_swapbacked(folio) &&
>>> - folio_test_large(folio)) {
>>> - /* Split shmem folio */
>>> - if (split_folio_to_list(folio, folio_list))
>>> - goto keep_locked;
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>>
>>> instead?
>>
>> Seems reasonable to me. But we should pass the 'folio_list' to
>> shmem_writepage() to list the subpages of the large folio. Let me try.
>
> Ah, yes, good point. Alternatively, we'd have to split and try writing
> all subpages in there. I wonder what to do if we fail to write some, and
> if we could handle that transparently, without the folio_list.
After some investigation, I prefer to pass 'folio_list' to
shmem_writepage() via 'struct writeback_control', which could simplify
the logic a lot. Otherwise, we need to handle each subpage's
writeback/reclaim/dirty state, as well as tracking each subpage's write
result, which seems more complicated.
I made a quick change by passing 'folio_list', and it looks simple and
works as expected.
diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
index 75196b0f894f..10100e22d5c6 100644
--- a/include/linux/writeback.h
+++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
@@ -80,6 +80,9 @@ struct writeback_control {
*/
struct swap_iocb **swap_plug;
+ /* Target list for splitting a large folio */
+ struct list_head *list;
+
/* internal fields used by the ->writepages implementation: */
struct folio_batch fbatch;
pgoff_t index;
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index 05525e9e7423..0a5a68f7d0a0 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -1496,9 +1496,10 @@ static int shmem_writepage(struct page *page,
struct writeback_control *wbc)
* and its shmem_writeback() needs them to be split when swapping.
*/
if (wbc->split_large_folio && folio_test_large(folio)) {
+try_split:
/* Ensure the subpages are still dirty */
folio_test_set_dirty(folio);
- if (split_huge_page(page) < 0)
+ if (split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(page, wbc->list, 0))
goto redirty;
folio = page_folio(page);
folio_clear_dirty(folio);
@@ -1540,8 +1541,12 @@ static int shmem_writepage(struct page *page,
struct writeback_control *wbc)
}
swap = folio_alloc_swap(folio);
- if (!swap.val)
+ if (!swap.val) {
+ if (nr_pages > 1)
+ goto try_split;
+
goto redirty;
+ }
/*
* Add inode to shmem_unuse()'s list of swapped-out inodes,
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 277571815789..cf982cf2454f 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ typedef enum {
* Calls ->writepage().
*/
static pageout_t pageout(struct folio *folio, struct address_space
*mapping,
- struct swap_iocb **plug)
+ struct swap_iocb **plug, struct list_head
*folio_list)
{
/*
* If the folio is dirty, only perform writeback if that write
@@ -676,6 +676,11 @@ static pageout_t pageout(struct folio *folio,
struct address_space *mapping,
.swap_plug = plug,
};
+ if (shmem_mapping(mapping)) {
+ wbc.list = folio_list;
+ wbc.split_large_folio =
!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THP_SWAP);
+ }
+
folio_set_reclaim(folio);
res = mapping->a_ops->writepage(&folio->page, &wbc);
if (res < 0)
@@ -1259,23 +1264,6 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct
list_head *folio_list,
goto activate_locked_split;
}
}
- } else if (folio_test_swapbacked(folio) &&
- folio_test_large(folio)) {
-
- /*
- * Do not split shmem folio if no swap memory
- * available.
- */
- if (!total_swap_pages)
- goto activate_locked;
-
- /*
- * Only split shmem folio when CONFIG_THP_SWAP
- * is not enabled.
- */
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THP_SWAP) &&
- split_folio_to_list(folio, folio_list))
- goto keep_locked;
}
/*
@@ -1377,18 +1365,21 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct
list_head *folio_list,
* starts and then write it out here.
*/
try_to_unmap_flush_dirty();
-try_pageout:
- switch (pageout(folio, mapping, &plug)) {
+ switch (pageout(folio, mapping, &plug,
folio_list)) {
case PAGE_KEEP:
goto keep_locked;
case PAGE_ACTIVATE:
- if (shmem_mapping(mapping) &&
folio_test_large(folio) &&
- !split_folio_to_list(folio,
folio_list)) {
+ /* Shmem can be split when writeback to
swap */
+ if ((nr_pages > 1) &&
!folio_test_large(folio)) {
+ sc->nr_scanned -= (nr_pages - 1);
nr_pages = 1;
- goto try_pageout;
}
goto activate_locked;
case PAGE_SUCCESS:
+ if ((nr_pages > 1) &&
!folio_test_large(folio)) {
+ sc->nr_scanned -= (nr_pages - 1);
+ nr_pages = 1;
+ }
stat->nr_pageout += nr_pages;
if (folio_test_writeback(folio)) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-08 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-07 7:31 [PATCH v4 00/10] support large folio swap-out and swap-in for shmem Baolin Wang
2024-08-07 7:31 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] mm: vmscan: add validation before spliting shmem large folio Baolin Wang
2024-08-07 15:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-08 2:36 ` Baolin Wang
2024-08-08 8:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-08 9:34 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2024-08-08 10:48 ` Daniel Gomez
2024-08-08 10:57 ` Daniel Gomez
2024-08-08 11:51 ` Baolin Wang
2024-08-08 12:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-09 3:21 ` Baolin Wang
2024-08-07 7:31 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] mm: swap: extend swap_shmem_alloc() to support batch SWAP_MAP_SHMEM flag setting Baolin Wang
2024-08-07 8:02 ` Barry Song
2024-08-07 7:31 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] mm: shmem: extend shmem_partial_swap_usage() to support large folio swap Baolin Wang
2024-08-07 7:31 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] mm: shmem: return number of pages beeing freed in shmem_free_swap Baolin Wang
2024-08-07 7:31 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] mm: filemap: use xa_get_order() to get the swap entry order Baolin Wang
2024-08-07 7:31 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] mm: shmem: use swap_free_nr() to free shmem swap entries Baolin Wang
2024-08-07 7:31 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] mm: shmem: support large folio allocation for shmem_replace_folio() Baolin Wang
2024-08-07 7:31 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] mm: shmem: drop folio reference count using 'nr_pages' in shmem_delete_from_page_cache() Baolin Wang
2024-08-07 7:31 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] mm: shmem: split large entry if the swapin folio is not large Baolin Wang
2024-08-07 7:31 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] mm: shmem: support large folio swap out Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1c4e67f1-caf5-4913-857d-b9cfbc30321e@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®