mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com
Cc: willy@infradead.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	chrisl@kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, 21cnbao@gmail.com,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com, shy828301@gmail.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
	ioworker0@gmail.com, da.gomez@samsung.com, p.raghav@samsung.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] mm: vmscan: add validation before spliting shmem large folio
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 17:34:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c4e67f1-caf5-4913-857d-b9cfbc30321e@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03a7c798-7a0d-4873-8fcb-8940d8dadc00@redhat.com>



On 2024/8/8 16:51, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 08.08.24 04:36, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2024/8/7 23:53, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 07.08.24 09:31, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>>> Page reclaim will not scan anon LRU if no swap space, however
>>>> MADV_PAGEOUT
>>>> can still split shmem large folios even without a swap device. Thus add
>>>> swap available space validation before spliting shmem large folio to
>>>> avoid redundant split.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    mm/vmscan.c | 8 ++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>>>> index 31d13462571e..796f65781f4f 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>>>> @@ -1259,6 +1259,14 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct
>>>> list_head *folio_list,
>>>>                }
>>>>            } else if (folio_test_swapbacked(folio) &&
>>>>                   folio_test_large(folio)) {
>>>> +
>>>> +            /*
>>>> +             * Do not split shmem folio if no swap memory
>>>> +             * available.
>>>> +             */
>>>> +            if (!total_swap_pages)
>>>> +                goto activate_locked;
>>>> +
>>>>                /* Split shmem folio */
>>>>                if (split_folio_to_list(folio, folio_list))
>>>>                    goto keep_locked;
>>>
>>> Reminds me of
>>>
>>> commit 9a976f0c847b67d22ed694556a3626ed92da0422
>>> Author: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
>>> Date:   Thu Mar 9 15:05:43 2023 -0800
>>>
>>>       shmem: skip page split if we're not reclaiming
>>>       In theory when info->flags & VM_LOCKED we should not be getting
>>>       shem_writepage() called so we should be verifying this with a
>>>       WARN_ON_ONCE().  Since we should not be swapping then best to
>>> ensure we
>>>       also don't do the folio split earlier too.  So just move the check
>>> early
>>>       to avoid folio splits in case its a dubious call.
>>>       We also have a similar early bail when !total_swap_pages so just
>>> move that
>>>       earlier to avoid the possible folio split in the same situation.
>>>
>>>
>>> But indeed, pageout() -> writepage() is called *after* the split in the
>>> vmscan path.
>>>
>>> In that "noswap" context, I wonder if we also want to skip folios part
>>> of shmem
>>> with disabled swapping?
>>
>> Yes, I think so.
>>
>>>
>>> But now I am wondering under which circumstances we end up calling
>>> shmem_writepage() with a large folio. And I think the answer is the
>>> comment of
>>> folio_test_large(): via drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shmem.c.
>>>
>>>
>>> ... so if shmem_writepage() handles+checks that, could we do
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>>> index a332cb80e928..7dfa3d6e8ba7 100644
>>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>>> @@ -1257,11 +1257,6 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct
>>> list_head *folio_list,
>>>                                                   goto
>>> activate_locked_split;
>>>                                   }
>>>                           }
>>> -               } else if (folio_test_swapbacked(folio) &&
>>> -                          folio_test_large(folio)) {
>>> -                       /* Split shmem folio */
>>> -                       if (split_folio_to_list(folio, folio_list))
>>> -                               goto keep_locked;
>>>                   }
>>>
>>>                   /*
>>>
>>> instead?
>>
>> Seems reasonable to me. But we should pass the 'folio_list' to
>> shmem_writepage() to list the subpages of the large folio. Let me try.
> 
> Ah, yes, good point. Alternatively, we'd have to split and try writing 
> all subpages in there. I wonder what to do if we fail to write some, and 
> if we could handle that transparently, without the folio_list.

After some investigation, I prefer to pass 'folio_list' to 
shmem_writepage() via 'struct writeback_control', which could simplify 
the logic a lot. Otherwise, we need to handle each subpage's 
writeback/reclaim/dirty state, as well as tracking each subpage's write 
result, which seems more complicated.

I made a quick change by passing 'folio_list', and it looks simple and 
works as expected.

diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
index 75196b0f894f..10100e22d5c6 100644
--- a/include/linux/writeback.h
+++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
@@ -80,6 +80,9 @@ struct writeback_control {
          */
         struct swap_iocb **swap_plug;

+       /* Target list for splitting a large folio */
+       struct list_head *list;
+
         /* internal fields used by the ->writepages implementation: */
         struct folio_batch fbatch;
         pgoff_t index;
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index 05525e9e7423..0a5a68f7d0a0 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -1496,9 +1496,10 @@ static int shmem_writepage(struct page *page, 
struct writeback_control *wbc)
          * and its shmem_writeback() needs them to be split when swapping.
          */
         if (wbc->split_large_folio && folio_test_large(folio)) {
+try_split:
                 /* Ensure the subpages are still dirty */
                 folio_test_set_dirty(folio);
-               if (split_huge_page(page) < 0)
+               if (split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(page, wbc->list, 0))
                         goto redirty;
                 folio = page_folio(page);
                 folio_clear_dirty(folio);
@@ -1540,8 +1541,12 @@ static int shmem_writepage(struct page *page, 
struct writeback_control *wbc)
         }

         swap = folio_alloc_swap(folio);
-       if (!swap.val)
+       if (!swap.val) {
+               if (nr_pages > 1)
+                       goto try_split;
+
                 goto redirty;
+       }

         /*
          * Add inode to shmem_unuse()'s list of swapped-out inodes,
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 277571815789..cf982cf2454f 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ typedef enum {
   * Calls ->writepage().
   */
  static pageout_t pageout(struct folio *folio, struct address_space 
*mapping,
-                        struct swap_iocb **plug)
+                        struct swap_iocb **plug, struct list_head 
*folio_list)
  {
         /*
          * If the folio is dirty, only perform writeback if that write
@@ -676,6 +676,11 @@ static pageout_t pageout(struct folio *folio, 
struct address_space *mapping,
                         .swap_plug = plug,
                 };

+               if (shmem_mapping(mapping)) {
+                       wbc.list = folio_list;
+                       wbc.split_large_folio = 
!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THP_SWAP);
+               }
+
                 folio_set_reclaim(folio);
                 res = mapping->a_ops->writepage(&folio->page, &wbc);
                 if (res < 0)
@@ -1259,23 +1264,6 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct 
list_head *folio_list,
                                                 goto activate_locked_split;
                                 }
                         }
-               } else if (folio_test_swapbacked(folio) &&
-                          folio_test_large(folio)) {
-
-                       /*
-                        * Do not split shmem folio if no swap memory
-                        * available.
-                        */
-                       if (!total_swap_pages)
-                               goto activate_locked;
-
-                       /*
-                        * Only split shmem folio when CONFIG_THP_SWAP
-                        * is not enabled.
-                        */
-                       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THP_SWAP) &&
-                           split_folio_to_list(folio, folio_list))
-                               goto keep_locked;
                 }

                 /*
@@ -1377,18 +1365,21 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct 
list_head *folio_list,
                          * starts and then write it out here.
                          */
                         try_to_unmap_flush_dirty();
-try_pageout:
-                       switch (pageout(folio, mapping, &plug)) {
+                       switch (pageout(folio, mapping, &plug, 
folio_list)) {
                         case PAGE_KEEP:
                                 goto keep_locked;
                         case PAGE_ACTIVATE:
-                               if (shmem_mapping(mapping) && 
folio_test_large(folio) &&
-                                   !split_folio_to_list(folio, 
folio_list)) {
+                               /* Shmem can be split when writeback to 
swap */
+                               if ((nr_pages > 1) && 
!folio_test_large(folio)) {
+                                       sc->nr_scanned -= (nr_pages - 1);
                                         nr_pages = 1;
-                                       goto try_pageout;
                                 }
                                 goto activate_locked;
                         case PAGE_SUCCESS:
+                               if ((nr_pages > 1) && 
!folio_test_large(folio)) {
+                                       sc->nr_scanned -= (nr_pages - 1);
+                                       nr_pages = 1;
+                               }
                                 stat->nr_pageout += nr_pages;

                                 if (folio_test_writeback(folio)) {

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-08  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-07  7:31 [PATCH v4 00/10] support large folio swap-out and swap-in for shmem Baolin Wang
2024-08-07  7:31 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] mm: vmscan: add validation before spliting shmem large folio Baolin Wang
2024-08-07 15:53   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-08  2:36     ` Baolin Wang
2024-08-08  8:51       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-08  9:34         ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2024-08-08 10:48           ` Daniel Gomez
2024-08-08 10:57             ` Daniel Gomez
2024-08-08 11:51               ` Baolin Wang
2024-08-08 12:35       ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-09  3:21         ` Baolin Wang
2024-08-07  7:31 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] mm: swap: extend swap_shmem_alloc() to support batch SWAP_MAP_SHMEM flag setting Baolin Wang
2024-08-07  8:02   ` Barry Song
2024-08-07  7:31 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] mm: shmem: extend shmem_partial_swap_usage() to support large folio swap Baolin Wang
2024-08-07  7:31 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] mm: shmem: return number of pages beeing freed in shmem_free_swap Baolin Wang
2024-08-07  7:31 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] mm: filemap: use xa_get_order() to get the swap entry order Baolin Wang
2024-08-07  7:31 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] mm: shmem: use swap_free_nr() to free shmem swap entries Baolin Wang
2024-08-07  7:31 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] mm: shmem: support large folio allocation for shmem_replace_folio() Baolin Wang
2024-08-07  7:31 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] mm: shmem: drop folio reference count using 'nr_pages' in shmem_delete_from_page_cache() Baolin Wang
2024-08-07  7:31 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] mm: shmem: split large entry if the swapin folio is not large Baolin Wang
2024-08-07  7:31 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] mm: shmem: support large folio swap out Baolin Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1c4e67f1-caf5-4913-857d-b9cfbc30321e@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®