mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	xeb@mail.ru, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Martin Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
	Talal Ahmad <talalahmad@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@pm.me>,
	Hao Peng <flyingpeng@tencent.com>,
	Mengen Sun <mengensun@tencent.com>,
	dongli.zhang@oracle.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Biao Jiang <benbjiang@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: gre_demux: add skb drop reasons to gre_rcv()
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 08:45:05 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1cab9152-a5bb-17e1-1101-f309a3be6365@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADxym3bK09hm2zn8yRU5g9fm=MhN7j9xZAjJEoV6_wpuvs9o-w@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/15/22 10:53 PM, Menglong Dong wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:49 AM David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/15/22 9:08 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 21:33:10 +0800 menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> +    reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED;
>>>>      if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, 12))
>>>>              goto drop;
>>>
>>> REASON_HDR_TRUNC ?
>>>
>>>>      ver = skb->data[1]&0x7f;
>>>> -    if (ver >= GREPROTO_MAX)
>>>> +    if (ver >= GREPROTO_MAX) {
>>>> +            reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_GRE_VERSION;
>>>
>>> TBH I'm still not sure what level of granularity we should be shooting
>>> for with the reasons. I'd throw all unexpected header values into one
>>> bucket, not go for a reason per field, per protocol. But as I'm said
>>> I'm not sure myself, so we can keep what you have..
>>
>> I have stated before I do not believe every single drop point in the
>> kernel needs a unique reason code. This is overkill. The reason augments
>> information we already have -- the IP from kfree_skb tracepoint.
> 
> Is this reason unnecessary? I'm not sure if the GRE version problem should
> be reported. With versions not supported by the kernel, it seems we
> can't get the
> drop reason from the packet data, as they are fine. And previous seems not
> suitable here, as it is a L4 problem.
> 

Generically, it is "no support for a protocol version". That kind of
reason code + the IP tells you GRE is processing a packet with an
unsupported protocol version.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-16 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-14 13:33 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: gre: add skb drop reasons to gre packet receive menglong8.dong
2022-03-14 13:33 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: gre_demux: add skb drop reasons to gre_rcv() menglong8.dong
2022-03-16  3:08   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-16  3:49     ` David Ahern
2022-03-16  4:53       ` Menglong Dong
2022-03-16 14:45         ` David Ahern [this message]
2022-03-16  4:55       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-16 10:12         ` David Laight
2022-03-16 18:55           ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-16 14:56         ` David Ahern
2022-03-16 18:57           ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-16 21:05             ` David Ahern
2022-03-16  4:41     ` Menglong Dong
2022-03-16  4:50       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-14 13:33 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: ipgre: make erspan_rcv() return PACKET_NEXT menglong8.dong
2022-03-14 13:33 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: ipgre: add skb drop reasons to gre_rcv() menglong8.dong
2022-03-16  3:17   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-16  6:21     ` Menglong Dong
2022-03-16 18:50       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-16 18:51       ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1cab9152-a5bb-17e1-1101-f309a3be6365@kernel.org \
    --to=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=alobakin@pm.me \
    --cc=benbjiang@tencent.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=flyingpeng@tencent.com \
    --cc=imagedong@tencent.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mengensun@tencent.com \
    --cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=talalahmad@google.com \
    --cc=xeb@mail.ru \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®