From: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
To: Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: aarch64 binaries using nolibc segfault before reaching the entry point
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 01:02:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d0342f3-0474-482b-b6db-81ca7820a462@t-8ch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2da5ce29-e0de-4715-aa77-453ff3cc48aa@t-8ch.de>
On 2023-09-13 22:19:00+0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2023-09-13 20:44:59+0200, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > the tpidr2 selftest on an arm box segfaults before reaching the entry point.
> > I have no clue what is to blame for this or how to debug it but for a
> > statically linked binary there shouldn't be much stuff going on besides the
> > elf loader?
> [..]
>
> I reduced it to the following reproducer:
>
> $ cat test.c
> int foo; /* It works when deleting this variable */
>
> void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("Os", "omit-frame-pointer"))) _start(void)
> {
> __asm__ volatile (
> "mov x8, 93\n" /* NR_exit == 93 */
> "svc #0\n"
> );
> __builtin_unreachable();
> }
>
> $ aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -Os -static -fno-stack-protector -Wall -nostdlib test.c
> $ ./a.out
> Segmentation fault
>
> Also when running under gdb the error message is:
>
> During startup program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>
> So it seems the error already happens during loading.
>
> Could be a compiler or kernel bug?
Callchain for the failure:
load_elf_binary()
-> if (likely(elf_bss != elf_brk) && unlikely(padzero(elf_bess)))
-> padzero()
-> clear_user()
-> __arch_clear_user()
-> failure in arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S
Resulting in a EFAULT which gets translated to SIGSEGV somewhere.
The following patch, which seems sensible to me, fixes it for me.
But as this is really old, heavily used code I'm a bit hesitant.
diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
index 7b3d2d491407..13f71733ba63 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static struct linux_binfmt elf_format = {
static int set_brk(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int prot)
{
- start = ELF_PAGEALIGN(start);
+ start = ELF_PAGESTART(start);
end = ELF_PAGEALIGN(end);
if (end > start) {
/*
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-13 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-13 18:44 Sebastian Ott
2023-09-13 19:17 ` Mark Brown
2023-09-13 20:19 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-13 20:58 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-09-13 21:23 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-13 21:30 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-09-13 23:02 ` Thomas Weißschuh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d0342f3-0474-482b-b6db-81ca7820a462@t-8ch.de \
--to=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sebott@redhat.com \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®