From: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
To: Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: aarch64 binaries using nolibc segfault before reaching the entry point
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 22:19:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2da5ce29-e0de-4715-aa77-453ff3cc48aa@t-8ch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d49767a-fbdc-fbe7-5fb2-d99ece3168cb@redhat.com>
On 2023-09-13 20:44:59+0200, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the tpidr2 selftest on an arm box segfaults before reaching the entry point.
> I have no clue what is to blame for this or how to debug it but for a
> statically linked binary there shouldn't be much stuff going on besides the
> elf loader?
>
> I can reproduce this with a program using an empty main function. Also checked
> for other nolibc users - same result for init.c from rcutorture.
>
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/za-fork is working though - the only
> difference I could spot here is that it is linked together with another object
> file. I also looked at the elf headers but didn't find anything obvious (but
> I'm a bit out of my comfort zone here..)
>
> After playing around with linker options I found that using -static-pie
> lets the binaries run successful.
>
> [root@arm abi]# cat test.c
> int main(void)
> {
> return 1;
> }
> [root@arm abi]# gcc -Os -static -Wall -lgcc -nostdlib -ffreestanding -include ../../../../include/nolibc/nolibc.h test.c
> [root@arm abi]# ./a.out Segmentation fault
> [root@arm abi]# gcc -Os -static -Wall -lgcc -nostdlib -ffreestanding -static-pie -include ../../../../include/nolibc/nolibc.h test.c
> [root@arm abi]# ./a.out [root@arm abi]#
>
> All on aarch64 running fedora37 + upstream kernel. Any hints on what could
> be borken here or how to actually fix it?
I reduced it to the following reproducer:
$ cat test.c
int foo; /* It works when deleting this variable */
void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("Os", "omit-frame-pointer"))) _start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
"mov x8, 93\n" /* NR_exit == 93 */
"svc #0\n"
);
__builtin_unreachable();
}
$ aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -Os -static -fno-stack-protector -Wall -nostdlib test.c
$ ./a.out
Segmentation fault
Also when running under gdb the error message is:
During startup program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
So it seems the error already happens during loading.
Could be a compiler or kernel bug?
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-13 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-13 18:44 Sebastian Ott
2023-09-13 19:17 ` Mark Brown
2023-09-13 20:19 ` Thomas Weißschuh [this message]
2023-09-13 20:58 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-09-13 21:23 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-13 21:30 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-09-13 23:02 ` Thomas Weißschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2da5ce29-e0de-4715-aa77-453ff3cc48aa@t-8ch.de \
--to=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sebott@redhat.com \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®