mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
	eranian@google.com, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] perf/x86: Fix data source decoding for Skylake
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 13:34:35 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d43622e-e1f3-de5a-ae49-9b4926db0ad4@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170608081531.iv27xaghntniwmm6@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>



On Thursday 08 June 2017 01:45 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 04:22:24PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> index b1c0b187acfe..95daade294d7 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> @@ -931,14 +931,18 @@ union perf_mem_data_src {
>>   			mem_snoop:5,	/* snoop mode */
>>   			mem_lock:2,	/* lock instr */
>>   			mem_dtlb:7,	/* tlb access */
>> -			mem_rsvd:31;
>> +			mem_lvlx:8,	/* memory hierarchy level, ext */
>> +			mem_snoopx:2,	/* snoop mode, ext */
>> +			mem_rsvd:21;
>>   	};
>>   };
>>   #elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
>>   union perf_mem_data_src {
>>   	__u64 val;
>>   	struct {
>> -		__u64	mem_rsvd:31,
>> +		__u64	mem_rsvd:21,
>> +			mem_snoopx:2,	/* snoop mode, ext */
>> +			mem_lvlx:8,	/* memory hierarchy level, ext */
>>   			mem_dtlb:7,	/* tlb access */
>>   			mem_lock:2,	/* lock instr */
>>   			mem_snoop:5,	/* snoop mode */
> So one thing we could do is add a mem_hops field and always set that,
> even for the old stuff. The old stuff will not know about that field and
> ignore the bits, but new stuff will then not need as many LVL bits.
>
> Of course, we then get into the problem of how many bits of hops we
> need.. Power guys ?

Currently we support 3 hops (local, remote and distant) and
in future we may have another for capi. So 4 levels of hops
might do. 8 would be nice future proof.

Maddy

>
>> @@ -975,6 +979,16 @@ union perf_mem_data_src {
>>   #define PERF_MEM_LVL_UNC	0x2000 /* Uncached memory */
>>   #define PERF_MEM_LVL_SHIFT	5
>>   
>> +#define PERF_MEM_LVLX_L4	0x01 /* L4 */
>> +#define PERF_MEM_LVLX_REM_L4    0x02 /* Remote L4 */
>> +#define PERF_MEM_LVLX_REM_RAM	0x04 /* Remote Ram, unknown hops */
>> +#define PERF_MEM_LVLX_PMEM	0x08 /* Persistent Memory */
>> +#define PERF_MEM_LVLX_REM_PMEM	0x10 /* Remote Persistent Memory */
>> +#define PERF_MEM_LVLX_REM_NA	0x20 /* Remote N/A level */
> Still wondering what the point of REM_NA is.. can you explain?
>
>> +/* 2 free */
>> +
>> +#define PERF_MEM_LVLX_SHIFT	33
>> +
>>   /* snoop mode */
>>   #define PERF_MEM_SNOOP_NA	0x01 /* not available */
>>   #define PERF_MEM_SNOOP_NONE	0x02 /* no snoop */
>> @@ -983,6 +997,10 @@ union perf_mem_data_src {
>>   #define PERF_MEM_SNOOP_HITM	0x10 /* snoop hit modified */
>>   #define PERF_MEM_SNOOP_SHIFT	19
>>   
>> +#define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_FWD	0x01 /* forward */
>> +/* 1 free */
>> +#define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_SHIFT	41
>> +
>>   /* locked instruction */
>>   #define PERF_MEM_LOCK_NA	0x01 /* not available */
>>   #define PERF_MEM_LOCK_LOCKED	0x02 /* locked transaction */
>> -- 
>> 2.9.4
>>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-09  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-07 23:22 Fix Skylake PEBS data source for perf Andi Kleen
2017-06-07 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf/x86: Move Nehalem PEBS code to flag Andi Kleen
2017-06-07 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf/x86: Fix data source decoding for Skylake Andi Kleen
2017-06-08  8:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-08 19:40     ` Stephane Eranian
2017-06-08 20:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-09 16:47         ` Andi Kleen
2017-06-08 20:10       ` Andi Kleen
2017-06-08 20:22         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-09  8:04     ` Madhavan Srinivasan [this message]
2017-06-07 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf, tools: Add support for printing new mem_info encodings Andi Kleen
2017-06-07 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] perf, tools: Add test cases for new data source encoding Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1d43622e-e1f3-de5a-ae49-9b4926db0ad4@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®