From: Eric Ren <zren@suse.com>
To: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mfasheh@versity.com,
jlbec@evilplan.org, ghe@suse.com, junxiao.bi@oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: fix deadlocks when taking inode lock at vfs entry points
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 16:21:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1dbd531e-39c3-d352-1052-bdbcb771a2c0@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6450d035-1eec-88a0-57c2-cc3dcc115a46@gmail.com>
On 01/06/2017 03:14 PM, Joseph Qi wrote:
>
>
> On 17/1/6 14:56, Eric Ren wrote:
>> On 01/06/2017 02:09 PM, Joseph Qi wrote:
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17/1/5 23:31, Eric Ren wrote:
>>>> Commit 743b5f1434f5 ("ocfs2: take inode lock in ocfs2_iop_set/get_acl()")
>>>> results in a deadlock, as the author "Tariq Saeed" realized shortly
>>>> after the patch was merged. The discussion happened here
>>>> (https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2015-September/011085.html).
>>>>
>>>> The reason why taking cluster inode lock at vfs entry points opens up
>>>> a self deadlock window, is explained in the previous patch of this
>>>> series.
>>>>
>>>> So far, we have seen two different code paths that have this issue.
>>>> 1. do_sys_open
>>>> may_open
>>>> inode_permission
>>>> ocfs2_permission
>>>> ocfs2_inode_lock() <=== take PR
>>>> generic_permission
>>>> get_acl
>>>> ocfs2_iop_get_acl
>>>> ocfs2_inode_lock() <=== take PR
>>>> 2. fchmod|fchmodat
>>>> chmod_common
>>>> notify_change
>>>> ocfs2_setattr <=== take EX
>>>> posix_acl_chmod
>>>> get_acl
>>>> ocfs2_iop_get_acl <=== take PR
>>>> ocfs2_iop_set_acl <=== take EX
>>>>
>>>> Fixes them by adding the tracking logic (in the previous patch) for
>>>> these funcs above, ocfs2_permission(), ocfs2_iop_[set|get]_acl(),
>>>> ocfs2_setattr().
>>> As described cases above, shall we just add the tracking logic only for set/get_acl()?
>>
>> The idea is to detect recursive locking on the running task stack. Take case 1) for
>> example if ocfs2_permisssion()
>> is not changed:
>>
>> ocfs2_permission() <=== take PR, ocfs2_holder is not added
>> ocfs2_iop_get_acl <=== still take PR, because there is no lock holder on the tracking
>> list
> I mean we have no need to check if locked by me, just do inode lock and add holder.
> This will make code more clean, IMO.
Oh, sorry, I get your point this time. I think we need to check it if there are more than
one processes that hold
PR lock on the same resource. If I don't understand you correctly, please tell me why you
think it's not neccessary
to check before getting lock?
Thanks,
Eric
>
> Thanks,
> Joseph
>>
>> Thanks for your review;-)
>> Eric
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Joseph
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Ren <zren@suse.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> fs/ocfs2/acl.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>> fs/ocfs2/file.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>>> 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/acl.c b/fs/ocfs2/acl.c
>>>> index bed1fcb..c539890 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/acl.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/acl.c
>>>> @@ -284,16 +284,31 @@ int ocfs2_iop_set_acl(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl,
>>>> int type)
>>>> {
>>>> struct buffer_head *bh = NULL;
>>>> int status = 0;
>>>> -
>>>> - status = ocfs2_inode_lock(inode, &bh, 1);
>>>> + int arg_flags = 0, has_locked;
>>>> + struct ocfs2_holder oh;
>>>> + struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres;
>>>> +
>>>> + lockres = &OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_inode_lockres;
>>>> + has_locked = (ocfs2_is_locked_by_me(lockres) != NULL);
>>>> + if (has_locked)
>>>> + arg_flags = OCFS2_META_LOCK_GETBH;
>>>> + status = ocfs2_inode_lock_full(inode, &bh, 1, arg_flags);
>>>> if (status < 0) {
>>>> if (status != -ENOENT)
>>>> mlog_errno(status);
>>>> return status;
>>>> }
>>>> + if (!has_locked)
>>>> + ocfs2_add_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>> +
>>>> status = ocfs2_set_acl(NULL, inode, bh, type, acl, NULL, NULL);
>>>> - ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 1);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!has_locked) {
>>>> + ocfs2_remove_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>> + ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 1);
>>>> + }
>>>> brelse(bh);
>>>> +
>>>> return status;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -303,21 +318,35 @@ struct posix_acl *ocfs2_iop_get_acl(struct inode *inode, int type)
>>>> struct buffer_head *di_bh = NULL;
>>>> struct posix_acl *acl;
>>>> int ret;
>>>> + int arg_flags = 0, has_locked;
>>>> + struct ocfs2_holder oh;
>>>> + struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres;
>>>> osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb);
>>>> if (!(osb->s_mount_opt & OCFS2_MOUNT_POSIX_ACL))
>>>> return NULL;
>>>> - ret = ocfs2_inode_lock(inode, &di_bh, 0);
>>>> +
>>>> + lockres = &OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_inode_lockres;
>>>> + has_locked = (ocfs2_is_locked_by_me(lockres) != NULL);
>>>> + if (has_locked)
>>>> + arg_flags = OCFS2_META_LOCK_GETBH;
>>>> + ret = ocfs2_inode_lock_full(inode, &di_bh, 0, arg_flags);
>>>> if (ret < 0) {
>>>> if (ret != -ENOENT)
>>>> mlog_errno(ret);
>>>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>>> }
>>>> + if (!has_locked)
>>>> + ocfs2_add_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>> acl = ocfs2_get_acl_nolock(inode, type, di_bh);
>>>> - ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 0);
>>>> + if (!has_locked) {
>>>> + ocfs2_remove_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>> + ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 0);
>>>> + }
>>>> brelse(di_bh);
>>>> +
>>>> return acl;
>>>> }
>>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
>>>> index c488965..62be75d 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
>>>> @@ -1138,6 +1138,9 @@ int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
>>>> handle_t *handle = NULL;
>>>> struct dquot *transfer_to[MAXQUOTAS] = { };
>>>> int qtype;
>>>> + int arg_flags = 0, had_lock;
>>>> + struct ocfs2_holder oh;
>>>> + struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres;
>>>> trace_ocfs2_setattr(inode, dentry,
>>>> (unsigned long long)OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_blkno,
>>>> @@ -1173,13 +1176,20 @@ int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> - status = ocfs2_inode_lock(inode, &bh, 1);
>>>> + lockres = &OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_inode_lockres;
>>>> + had_lock = (ocfs2_is_locked_by_me(lockres) != NULL);
>>>> + if (had_lock)
>>>> + arg_flags = OCFS2_META_LOCK_GETBH;
>>>> + status = ocfs2_inode_lock_full(inode, &bh, 1, arg_flags);
>>>> if (status < 0) {
>>>> if (status != -ENOENT)
>>>> mlog_errno(status);
>>>> goto bail_unlock_rw;
>>>> }
>>>> - inode_locked = 1;
>>>> + if (!had_lock) {
>>>> + ocfs2_add_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>> + inode_locked = 1;
>>>> + }
>>>> if (size_change) {
>>>> status = inode_newsize_ok(inode, attr->ia_size);
>>>> @@ -1260,7 +1270,8 @@ int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
>>>> bail_commit:
>>>> ocfs2_commit_trans(osb, handle);
>>>> bail_unlock:
>>>> - if (status) {
>>>> + if (status && inode_locked) {
>>>> + ocfs2_remove_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>> ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 1);
>>>> inode_locked = 0;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -1278,8 +1289,10 @@ int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
>>>> if (status < 0)
>>>> mlog_errno(status);
>>>> }
>>>> - if (inode_locked)
>>>> + if (inode_locked) {
>>>> + ocfs2_remove_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>> ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 1);
>>>> + }
>>>> brelse(bh);
>>>> return status;
>>>> @@ -1321,20 +1334,31 @@ int ocfs2_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt,
>>>> int ocfs2_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
>>>> {
>>>> int ret;
>>>> + int has_locked;
>>>> + struct ocfs2_holder oh;
>>>> + struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres;
>>>> if (mask & MAY_NOT_BLOCK)
>>>> return -ECHILD;
>>>> - ret = ocfs2_inode_lock(inode, NULL, 0);
>>>> - if (ret) {
>>>> - if (ret != -ENOENT)
>>>> - mlog_errno(ret);
>>>> - goto out;
>>>> + lockres = &OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_inode_lockres;
>>>> + has_locked = (ocfs2_is_locked_by_me(lockres) != NULL);
>>>> + if (!has_locked) {
>>>> + ret = ocfs2_inode_lock(inode, NULL, 0);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + if (ret != -ENOENT)
>>>> + mlog_errno(ret);
>>>> + goto out;
>>>> + }
>>>> + ocfs2_add_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>> }
>>>> ret = generic_permission(inode, mask);
>>>> - ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 0);
>>>> + if (!has_locked) {
>>>> + ocfs2_remove_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>> + ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 0);
>>>> + }
>>>> out:
>>>> return ret;
>>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-06 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-05 15:31 [PATCH 0/2] fix deadlock caused by recursive cluster locking Eric Ren
2017-01-05 15:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2/dlmglue: prepare tracking logic to avoid recursive cluster lock Eric Ren
2017-01-06 6:07 ` Joseph Qi
2017-01-06 7:03 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-06 7:24 ` Joseph Qi
2017-01-06 8:04 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-13 3:59 ` Junxiao Bi
2017-01-13 6:12 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-16 2:42 ` Junxiao Bi
2017-01-16 3:31 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-05 15:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: fix deadlocks when taking inode lock at vfs entry points Eric Ren
2017-01-06 6:09 ` Joseph Qi
2017-01-06 6:56 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-06 7:14 ` Joseph Qi
2017-01-06 8:21 ` Eric Ren [this message]
2017-01-06 9:03 ` Joseph Qi
2017-01-06 9:13 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-06 9:55 ` Joseph Qi
2017-01-06 11:56 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-09 1:13 ` Joseph Qi
2017-01-09 2:13 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-12 11:24 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Eric Ren
2017-01-12 11:36 ` Joseph Qi
2017-01-06 14:52 ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-09 5:24 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-06 17:53 ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-13 4:22 ` Junxiao Bi
2017-01-13 6:19 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-16 2:46 ` Junxiao Bi
2017-01-16 3:06 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-16 3:13 ` Junxiao Bi
2017-01-16 3:17 ` Eric Ren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1dbd531e-39c3-d352-1052-bdbcb771a2c0@suse.com \
--to=zren@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ghe@suse.com \
--cc=jiangqi903@gmail.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfasheh@versity.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®