From: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
To: Eric Ren <zren@suse.com>, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mfasheh@versity.com,
jlbec@evilplan.org, ghe@suse.com, junxiao.bi@oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: fix deadlocks when taking inode lock at vfs entry points
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 17:03:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8fb854e-14eb-4e14-0329-0807f0c43177@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1dbd531e-39c3-d352-1052-bdbcb771a2c0@suse.com>
On 17/1/6 16:21, Eric Ren wrote:
> On 01/06/2017 03:14 PM, Joseph Qi wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 17/1/6 14:56, Eric Ren wrote:
>>> On 01/06/2017 02:09 PM, Joseph Qi wrote:
>>>> Hi Eric,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 17/1/5 23:31, Eric Ren wrote:
>>>>> Commit 743b5f1434f5 ("ocfs2: take inode lock in
>>>>> ocfs2_iop_set/get_acl()")
>>>>> results in a deadlock, as the author "Tariq Saeed" realized shortly
>>>>> after the patch was merged. The discussion happened here
>>>>> (https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2015-September/011085.html).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The reason why taking cluster inode lock at vfs entry points opens up
>>>>> a self deadlock window, is explained in the previous patch of this
>>>>> series.
>>>>>
>>>>> So far, we have seen two different code paths that have this issue.
>>>>> 1. do_sys_open
>>>>> may_open
>>>>> inode_permission
>>>>> ocfs2_permission
>>>>> ocfs2_inode_lock() <=== take PR
>>>>> generic_permission
>>>>> get_acl
>>>>> ocfs2_iop_get_acl
>>>>> ocfs2_inode_lock() <=== take PR
>>>>> 2. fchmod|fchmodat
>>>>> chmod_common
>>>>> notify_change
>>>>> ocfs2_setattr <=== take EX
>>>>> posix_acl_chmod
>>>>> get_acl
>>>>> ocfs2_iop_get_acl <=== take PR
>>>>> ocfs2_iop_set_acl <=== take EX
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes them by adding the tracking logic (in the previous patch) for
>>>>> these funcs above, ocfs2_permission(), ocfs2_iop_[set|get]_acl(),
>>>>> ocfs2_setattr().
>>>> As described cases above, shall we just add the tracking logic only
>>>> for set/get_acl()?
>>>
>>> The idea is to detect recursive locking on the running task stack.
>>> Take case 1) for example if ocfs2_permisssion()
>>> is not changed:
>>>
>>> ocfs2_permission() <=== take PR, ocfs2_holder is not added
>>> ocfs2_iop_get_acl <=== still take PR, because there is no lock
>>> holder on the tracking list
>> I mean we have no need to check if locked by me, just do inode lock
>> and add holder.
>> This will make code more clean, IMO.
> Oh, sorry, I get your point this time. I think we need to check it if
> there are more than one processes that hold
> PR lock on the same resource. If I don't understand you correctly,
> please tell me why you think it's not neccessary
> to check before getting lock?
The code logic can only check if it is locked by myself. In the case
described above, ocfs2_permission is the first entry to take inode lock.
And even if check succeeds, it is a bug without unlock, but not the case
of recursive lock.
Thanks,
Joseph
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joseph
>>>
>>> Thanks for your review;-)
>>> Eric
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Joseph
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Ren <zren@suse.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> fs/ocfs2/acl.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>>> fs/ocfs2/file.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>>>> 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/acl.c b/fs/ocfs2/acl.c
>>>>> index bed1fcb..c539890 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/acl.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/acl.c
>>>>> @@ -284,16 +284,31 @@ int ocfs2_iop_set_acl(struct inode *inode,
>>>>> struct posix_acl *acl, int type)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct buffer_head *bh = NULL;
>>>>> int status = 0;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - status = ocfs2_inode_lock(inode, &bh, 1);
>>>>> + int arg_flags = 0, has_locked;
>>>>> + struct ocfs2_holder oh;
>>>>> + struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + lockres = &OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_inode_lockres;
>>>>> + has_locked = (ocfs2_is_locked_by_me(lockres) != NULL);
>>>>> + if (has_locked)
>>>>> + arg_flags = OCFS2_META_LOCK_GETBH;
>>>>> + status = ocfs2_inode_lock_full(inode, &bh, 1, arg_flags);
>>>>> if (status < 0) {
>>>>> if (status != -ENOENT)
>>>>> mlog_errno(status);
>>>>> return status;
>>>>> }
>>>>> + if (!has_locked)
>>>>> + ocfs2_add_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>>> +
>>>>> status = ocfs2_set_acl(NULL, inode, bh, type, acl, NULL, NULL);
>>>>> - ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 1);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!has_locked) {
>>>>> + ocfs2_remove_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>>> + ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 1);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> brelse(bh);
>>>>> +
>>>>> return status;
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -303,21 +318,35 @@ struct posix_acl *ocfs2_iop_get_acl(struct
>>>>> inode *inode, int type)
>>>>> struct buffer_head *di_bh = NULL;
>>>>> struct posix_acl *acl;
>>>>> int ret;
>>>>> + int arg_flags = 0, has_locked;
>>>>> + struct ocfs2_holder oh;
>>>>> + struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres;
>>>>> osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb);
>>>>> if (!(osb->s_mount_opt & OCFS2_MOUNT_POSIX_ACL))
>>>>> return NULL;
>>>>> - ret = ocfs2_inode_lock(inode, &di_bh, 0);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + lockres = &OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_inode_lockres;
>>>>> + has_locked = (ocfs2_is_locked_by_me(lockres) != NULL);
>>>>> + if (has_locked)
>>>>> + arg_flags = OCFS2_META_LOCK_GETBH;
>>>>> + ret = ocfs2_inode_lock_full(inode, &di_bh, 0, arg_flags);
>>>>> if (ret < 0) {
>>>>> if (ret != -ENOENT)
>>>>> mlog_errno(ret);
>>>>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>>>> }
>>>>> + if (!has_locked)
>>>>> + ocfs2_add_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>>> acl = ocfs2_get_acl_nolock(inode, type, di_bh);
>>>>> - ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 0);
>>>>> + if (!has_locked) {
>>>>> + ocfs2_remove_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>>> + ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 0);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> brelse(di_bh);
>>>>> +
>>>>> return acl;
>>>>> }
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
>>>>> index c488965..62be75d 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
>>>>> @@ -1138,6 +1138,9 @@ int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry,
>>>>> struct iattr *attr)
>>>>> handle_t *handle = NULL;
>>>>> struct dquot *transfer_to[MAXQUOTAS] = { };
>>>>> int qtype;
>>>>> + int arg_flags = 0, had_lock;
>>>>> + struct ocfs2_holder oh;
>>>>> + struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres;
>>>>> trace_ocfs2_setattr(inode, dentry,
>>>>> (unsigned long long)OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_blkno,
>>>>> @@ -1173,13 +1176,20 @@ int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry,
>>>>> struct iattr *attr)
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>> - status = ocfs2_inode_lock(inode, &bh, 1);
>>>>> + lockres = &OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_inode_lockres;
>>>>> + had_lock = (ocfs2_is_locked_by_me(lockres) != NULL);
>>>>> + if (had_lock)
>>>>> + arg_flags = OCFS2_META_LOCK_GETBH;
>>>>> + status = ocfs2_inode_lock_full(inode, &bh, 1, arg_flags);
>>>>> if (status < 0) {
>>>>> if (status != -ENOENT)
>>>>> mlog_errno(status);
>>>>> goto bail_unlock_rw;
>>>>> }
>>>>> - inode_locked = 1;
>>>>> + if (!had_lock) {
>>>>> + ocfs2_add_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>>> + inode_locked = 1;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> if (size_change) {
>>>>> status = inode_newsize_ok(inode, attr->ia_size);
>>>>> @@ -1260,7 +1270,8 @@ int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry,
>>>>> struct iattr *attr)
>>>>> bail_commit:
>>>>> ocfs2_commit_trans(osb, handle);
>>>>> bail_unlock:
>>>>> - if (status) {
>>>>> + if (status && inode_locked) {
>>>>> + ocfs2_remove_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>>> ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 1);
>>>>> inode_locked = 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -1278,8 +1289,10 @@ int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry,
>>>>> struct iattr *attr)
>>>>> if (status < 0)
>>>>> mlog_errno(status);
>>>>> }
>>>>> - if (inode_locked)
>>>>> + if (inode_locked) {
>>>>> + ocfs2_remove_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>>> ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 1);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> brelse(bh);
>>>>> return status;
>>>>> @@ -1321,20 +1334,31 @@ int ocfs2_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt,
>>>>> int ocfs2_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
>>>>> {
>>>>> int ret;
>>>>> + int has_locked;
>>>>> + struct ocfs2_holder oh;
>>>>> + struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres;
>>>>> if (mask & MAY_NOT_BLOCK)
>>>>> return -ECHILD;
>>>>> - ret = ocfs2_inode_lock(inode, NULL, 0);
>>>>> - if (ret) {
>>>>> - if (ret != -ENOENT)
>>>>> - mlog_errno(ret);
>>>>> - goto out;
>>>>> + lockres = &OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_inode_lockres;
>>>>> + has_locked = (ocfs2_is_locked_by_me(lockres) != NULL);
>>>>> + if (!has_locked) {
>>>>> + ret = ocfs2_inode_lock(inode, NULL, 0);
>>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>>> + if (ret != -ENOENT)
>>>>> + mlog_errno(ret);
>>>>> + goto out;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + ocfs2_add_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>>> }
>>>>> ret = generic_permission(inode, mask);
>>>>> - ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 0);
>>>>> + if (!has_locked) {
>>>>> + ocfs2_remove_holder(lockres, &oh);
>>>>> + ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 0);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> out:
>>>>> return ret;
>>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-06 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-05 15:31 [PATCH 0/2] fix deadlock caused by recursive cluster locking Eric Ren
2017-01-05 15:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2/dlmglue: prepare tracking logic to avoid recursive cluster lock Eric Ren
2017-01-06 6:07 ` Joseph Qi
2017-01-06 7:03 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-06 7:24 ` Joseph Qi
2017-01-06 8:04 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-13 3:59 ` Junxiao Bi
2017-01-13 6:12 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-16 2:42 ` Junxiao Bi
2017-01-16 3:31 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-05 15:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: fix deadlocks when taking inode lock at vfs entry points Eric Ren
2017-01-06 6:09 ` Joseph Qi
2017-01-06 6:56 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-06 7:14 ` Joseph Qi
2017-01-06 8:21 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-06 9:03 ` Joseph Qi [this message]
2017-01-06 9:13 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-06 9:55 ` Joseph Qi
2017-01-06 11:56 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-09 1:13 ` Joseph Qi
2017-01-09 2:13 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-12 11:24 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Eric Ren
2017-01-12 11:36 ` Joseph Qi
2017-01-06 14:52 ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-09 5:24 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-06 17:53 ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-13 4:22 ` Junxiao Bi
2017-01-13 6:19 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-16 2:46 ` Junxiao Bi
2017-01-16 3:06 ` Eric Ren
2017-01-16 3:13 ` Junxiao Bi
2017-01-16 3:17 ` Eric Ren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e8fb854e-14eb-4e14-0329-0807f0c43177@gmail.com \
--to=jiangqi903@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ghe@suse.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfasheh@versity.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=zren@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome