From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>
To: "Philipp Stanner" <phasta@kernel.org>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/sched: Don't crash kernel on wrong params
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:46:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e71b41d-38ba-425a-a370-1bb92a772014@ursulin.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251112091851.104443-3-phasta@kernel.org>
On 12/11/2025 09:18, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> drm_sched_job_arm() just panics the kernel with BUG_ON() in case of an
> entity being NULL. If the entity is NULL, subsequent accesses will crash
> the particular CPU anyways with a NULL pointer exception backtrace.
>
> Remove the BUG_ON().
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Drop BUG_ON() instead of replacing it. (Tvrtko)
The option of removing the BUG_ON was conditional on brainstorming a bit
whether we think the null pointer dereference is the worst that can
happen or not.
Other option was "WARN_ON_ONCE() return" in arm and push.
Problem being, if we allow it to continue, are we opening up the
possibly to mess up the kernel in a worse way.
For example push job writes to the entity. Okay offsets are low so is
the zero page always safe to write? I don't know but sounds scary. From
that point of view BUG_ON or WARN_ON_ONCE with exit are safer options.
Regards,
Tvrtko
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> index 1d4f1b822e7b..05eb50d4cf08 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> @@ -857,7 +857,6 @@ void drm_sched_job_arm(struct drm_sched_job *job)
> struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched;
> struct drm_sched_entity *entity = job->entity;
>
> - BUG_ON(!entity);
> drm_sched_entity_select_rq(entity);
> sched = entity->rq->sched;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-12 9:18 Philipp Stanner
2025-11-12 9:46 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2025-11-12 12:09 ` Philipp Stanner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1e71b41d-38ba-425a-a370-1bb92a772014@ursulin.net \
--to=tursulin@ursulin.net \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=phasta@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®