From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: yangxingui <yangxingui@huawei.com>,
liyihang9@huawei.com, yanaijie@huawei.com
Cc: jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxarm@huawei.com, prime.zeng@huawei.com,
liuyonglong@huawei.com, kangfenglong@huawei.com,
liyangyang20@huawei.com, f.fangjian@huawei.com,
xiabing14@h-partners.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] scsi: hisi_sas: Enable force phy when SATA disk directly connected
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 08:29:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e98a1eb-a763-4190-94c5-a867cdf0e09b@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a4384dc-4edb-9e29-d1dd-190d69b9e313@huawei.com>
On 21/02/2025 01:59, yangxingui wrote:
> Hi, John
>
> On 2025/2/21 1:35, John Garry wrote:
>> On 20/02/2025 13:05, Xingui Yang wrote:
>>
>> -john.garry@huawei.com (this has not worked in over 2 years ...)
> Sorry, I used the wrong one.
>>
>>> the SAS controller determines the disk to which I/Os are delivered based
>>> on the port id in the DQ entry when SATA disk directly connected.
>>>
>>> When many phys were disconnected immediately and connected again during
>>> I/O sending and port id of phys were changed and used by other link, I/O
>>> may be sent to incorrect disk and data inconsistency on the SATA disk
>>> may
>>
>>
>> So is the disk reported gone (from libsas point-of-view) after you
>> unplug? If not, why not?
>
> The problem may occur in a scenario where multiple SATA disks are
> inserted almost at the same time. When phy reset is executed in error
> processing, other phys are also up, which may cause the hw port id
> corresponding to the phy to change. The log is as follows:
>
> [ 4588.608924] hisi_sas_v3_hw 0000:b4:02.0: phyup: phy2 link_rate=10(sata)
> [ 4588.609039] sas: phy-8:2 added to port-8:4, phy_mask:0x4
> (5000000000000802)
> [ 4588.609267] sas: DOING DISCOVERY on port 4, pid:69294
> [ 4588.609276] hisi_sas_v3_hw 0000:b4:02.0: dev[13:5] found
> [ 4588.671362] sas: ata40: end_device-8:4: dev error handler
> [ 4588.846387] hisi_sas_v3_hw 0000:b4:02.0: phydown: phy2
> phy_state=0xc3 // phy2's hw port id assign by chip is released
> [ 4588.846393] hisi_sas_v3_hw 0000:b4:02.0: ignore flutter phy2 down
> [ 4588.919837] hisi_sas_v3_hw 0000:b4:02.0: phyup: phy3
> link_rate=10(sata) // phy3 is assigned the hw port id previously used by
> phy2
> [ 4589.029656] hisi_sas_v3_hw 0000:b4:02.0: phyup: phy2
> link_rate=10(sata) // phy2's hw port id is assigned a new one
> [ 4589.220662] ata40.00: ATA-9: HUH721010ALE600, T3C0, max UDMA/133
> [ 4589.220666] ata40.00: 19532873728 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth
> 32), AA
> [ 4589.233022] ata40.00: configured for UDMA/133
>
> In view of the situation corresponding to the above log, the
> hisi_sas_port.id corresponding to phy2 has not been updated, and the old
> port id is still used, which will cause the IO delivered to phy2 to be
> abnormally delivered to the disk of phy3.
>
> After force phy, the chip will check whether the phy information matches
> the port id and intercept this abnormal IO.
>
So do you mean that all IO to this disk will error? If yes, then this is
good.
But I still don't like the handling in this patch. If we get a phy up,
then the directly-attached disk ideally should be gone already, so
should not have to do this handling.
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-24 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-20 13:05 [PATCH v3 0/3] scsi: hisi_sas: Fixed IO error caused by port id not updated Xingui Yang
2025-02-20 13:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] scsi: hisi_sas: Enable force phy when SATA disk directly connected Xingui Yang
2025-02-20 17:35 ` John Garry
2025-02-21 1:59 ` yangxingui
2025-02-24 8:29 ` John Garry [this message]
2025-02-24 9:36 ` yangxingui
2025-02-24 12:21 ` John Garry
2025-02-24 13:12 ` yangxingui
2025-02-24 17:34 ` John Garry
2025-02-25 1:48 ` yangxingui
2025-02-25 8:19 ` John Garry
2025-02-25 9:35 ` yangxingui
2025-02-26 8:57 ` John Garry
2025-02-27 8:33 ` yangxingui
2025-03-04 9:48 ` John Garry
2025-03-05 8:16 ` yangxingui
2025-03-05 16:15 ` John Garry
2025-03-06 1:44 ` yangxingui
2025-03-10 13:09 ` yangxingui
2025-03-10 17:45 ` John Garry
2025-03-11 1:53 ` yangxingui
2025-03-12 9:44 ` yangxingui
2025-03-12 11:19 ` John Garry
2025-02-20 13:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] scsi: libsas: Move sas_put_device() to libsas.h Xingui Yang
2025-02-21 2:36 ` Jason Yan
2025-02-20 13:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] scsi: hisi_sas: Fixed IO error caused by port id not updated Xingui Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1e98a1eb-a763-4190-94c5-a867cdf0e09b@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=f.fangjian@huawei.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kangfenglong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
--cc=liyangyang20@huawei.com \
--cc=liyihang9@huawei.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@huawei.com \
--cc=xiabing14@h-partners.com \
--cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
--cc=yangxingui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®