From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: sstabellini@kernel.org, jgross@suse.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Feng Kan <fkan@apm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/privcmd: Support correctly 64KB page granularity when mapping memory
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:38:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f38dcc0-8538-b8e5-a792-85867ea1c44d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cfddbb3f-25fe-0b0d-5e8f-24d68b931dd0@oracle.com>
Hi Boris,
On 01/06/17 16:16, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 06/01/2017 10:01 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Boris,
>>
>> On 01/06/17 14:33, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 06/01/2017 08:50 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>> Hi Boris,
>>>>
>>>> On 31/05/17 14:54, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>>> On 05/31/2017 09:03 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>>>> Commit 5995a68 "xen/privcmd: Add support for Linux 64KB page
>>>>>> granularity" did
>>>>>> not go far enough to support 64KB in mmap_batch_fn.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The variable 'nr' is the number of 4KB chunk to map. However, when
>>>>>> Linux
>>>>>> is using 64KB page granularity the array of pages
>>>>>> (vma->vm_private_data)
>>>>>> contain one page per 64KB. Fix it by incrementing st->index
>>>>>> correctly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Furthermore, st->va is not correctly incremented as PAGE_SIZE !=
>>>>>> XEN_PAGE_SIZE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixes: 5995a68 ("xen/privcmd: Add support for Linux 64KB page
>>>>>> granularity")
>>>>>> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>>>>> Reported-by: Feng Kan <fkan@apm.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/xen/privcmd.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/privcmd.c b/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
>>>>>> index 7a92a5e1d40c..feca75b07fdd 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
>>>>>> @@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ static int mmap_batch_fn(void *data, int nr,
>>>>>> void *state)
>>>>>> st->global_error = 1;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> - st->va += PAGE_SIZE * nr;
>>>>>> - st->index += nr;
>>>>>> + st->va += XEN_PAGE_SIZE * nr;
>>>>>> + st->index += nr / XEN_PFN_PER_PAGE;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Are we still using PAGE_MASK for xen_remap_domain_gfn_array()?
>>>>
>>>> Do you mean in the xen_xlate_remap_gfn_array implementation? If so
>>>> there are no use of PAGE_MASK as the code has been converted to
>>>> support 64K page granularity.
>>>>
>>>> If you mean the x86 version of xen_remap_domain_gfn_array, then we
>>>> don't really care as x86 only use 4KB page granularity.
>>>
>>>
>>> I meant right above the change that you made. Should it also be replaced
>>> with XEN_PAGE_MASK? (Sorry for being unclear.)
>>
>> Oh. The code in xen_remap_domain_gfn_array is relying on st->va to be
>> page aligned. So I think we want to keep PAGE_MASK here.
>
> Doe this imply then that 'nr' 4K pages is integral number of PAGE_SIZE
> (i.e. (nr*XEN_PAGE_SIZE) % PAGE_SIZE == 0) and if yes --- do we test
> this somewhere? I don't see it.
nr might be smaller for the last batch. But all the intermediate batch
should have ((nr * XEN_PAGE_SIZE) % PAGE_SIZE == 0).
I think the BUILD_BUG_ON in privcmd_ioctl_mmap_batch ensure that all the
intermediate batch will always be an integral number of PAGE_SIZE.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-01 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-31 13:03 Julien Grall
2017-05-31 13:54 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-06-01 12:50 ` Julien Grall
2017-06-01 13:33 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-06-01 14:01 ` Julien Grall
2017-06-01 15:16 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-06-01 15:38 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2017-06-01 20:41 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-06-01 21:04 ` Julien Grall
2017-06-06 16:17 ` Julien Grall
2017-06-07 9:25 ` Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1f38dcc0-8538-b8e5-a792-85867ea1c44d@arm.com \
--to=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=fkan@apm.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®