From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
Philippe Boos <pboos@baylibre.com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] watchdog: meson: keep running if already active
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 19:00:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1j4jzuyxq8.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220706164325.GA776177@roeck-us.net>
On Wed 06 Jul 2022 at 09:43, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 03:24:27PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>>
> [ ... ]
>
>>
>> No worries. That being said, I have gone over
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
>>
>> It just says that Reviewed-by sent on the list should be collected for
>> the following version. Nothing against adding the tag if the job has
>> been done, on or off list. Same goes for Suggested-by, Tested-by, etc.
>>
>> If I missed something or it is non-written rule, please let me know.
>
> Your interpretation is quite a strict one. I don't think there is a rule
> that states that tags not sent to a list must not be collected.
>
> Anyway, I would have called it common sense, especially since it does
> happen that someone accidentally hits "reply" instead of "reply all"
> and replies end up not being sent to the list. If you expect me to dig
> through e-mail headers to determine if you meant your tags to be published
> or not, sorry, that won't happen. Do not send me e-mails with any tags
> unless you accept that they may be published.
>
> Guenter
Exactly. Not expecting anything. I'm 100% aligned with you.
Maybe this is where is misunderstanding is.
The Reviewed-by was there when Philippe sent his mail.
I was meant to be there and taken. Plain and simple.
No other expectation whatsoever.
I'm not asking for the tag to dropped, quite the opposite actually.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-06 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-05 14:24 Philippe Boos
2022-07-05 14:39 ` Neil Armstrong
2022-07-05 19:29 ` Jerome Brunet
2022-07-06 12:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-07-06 13:24 ` Jerome Brunet
2022-07-06 16:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-07-06 17:00 ` Jerome Brunet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1j4jzuyxq8.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com \
--to=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
--cc=pboos@baylibre.com \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®