Re: Enviromental Monitoring

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

[Graham Murray]

Peter Samuelson <peter@cadcamlab.org> writes:

> [Andrew Stubbs]
> > Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate
> > the enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many
> > motherboards provide via their bios's ?
> 
> Do a search on 'lm_sensors'.

Does this work with the latest 2.4.0-testxx kernels. It stopped
working for me quite a few kernel tests ago.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Enviromental Monitoring

[Andrew Stubbs]

This probably is not the right lpace, but can't think of where else to ask

Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate the
enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many motherboards provide
via their bios's ?

Please point me in the right direction

Andrew

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

[Peter Samuelson]

[Andrew Stubbs]
> Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate
> the enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many
> motherboards provide via their bios's ?

Do a search on 'lm_sensors'.

Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

[philippe]

> Peter Samuelson <peter@cadcamlab.org> writes:
> 
> > [Andrew Stubbs]
> > > Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate
> > > the enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many
> > > motherboards provide via their bios's ?
> > 
> > Do a search on 'lm_sensors'.
> 
> Does this work with the latest 2.4.0-testxx kernels. It stopped
> working for me quite a few kernel tests ago.

lm_sensors 2.4.5 work fine for my abit bp6
cannot succed to use 2.5.x serie


> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

[Mohammad A. Haque]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 709 bytes --]

Try this patch against the 2.5.x series. I submitted it to them back
when it broke with test8 but never checked if it made it in.



philippe wrote:
> 
> lm_sensors 2.4.5 work fine for my abit bp6
> cannot succed to use 2.5.x serie

-- 

=====================================================================
Mohammad A. Haque                              http://www.haque.net/ 
                                               mhaque@haque.net

  "Alcohol and calculus don't mix.             Project Lead
   Don't drink and derive." --Unknown          http://wm.themes.org/
                                               batmanppc@themes.org
=====================================================================

[-- Attachment #2: lm_sensors-2.5.2+2.4.0-test8-pre2.diff.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 878 bytes --]

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

[Mohammad A. Haque]

Hit http://www.lm-sensors.nu/

Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate the
> enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many motherboards provide
> via their bios's ?
> 
> Please point me in the right direction

-- 

=====================================================================
Mohammad A. Haque                              http://www.haque.net/ 
                                               mhaque@haque.net

  "Alcohol and calculus don't mix.             Project Lead
   Don't drink and derive." --Unknown          http://wm.themes.org/
                                               batmanppc@themes.org
=====================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

[David Ford]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 120 bytes --]

"Mohammad A. Haque" wrote:

> Hit http://www.lm-sensors.nu/

does anyone have an IP address for cvs.lm-sensors.nu?

-d


[-- Attachment #2: Card for David Ford --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 274 bytes --]

begin:vcard 
n:Ford;David
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:www.blue-labs.org
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:david@blue-labs.org
title:Blue Labs Developer
note;quoted-printable:GPG key: http://www.blue-labs.org/david@nifty.key=0D=0A
x-mozilla-cpt:;9952
fn:David Ford
end:vcard

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

[Mohammad A. Haque]

Looks like their dns server is borked. I can't even get to their site.

David Ford wrote:
> 
> "Mohammad A. Haque" wrote:
> 
> > Hit http://www.lm-sensors.nu/
> 
> does anyone have an IP address for cvs.lm-sensors.nu?
> 
> -d

-- 

=====================================================================
Mohammad A. Haque                              http://www.haque.net/ 
                                               mhaque@haque.net

  "Alcohol and calculus don't mix.             Project Lead
   Don't drink and derive." --Unknown          http://wm.themes.org/
                                               batmanppc@themes.org
=====================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

[Paul Jakma]

On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:

> Hit http://www.lm-sensors.nu/

do these guys /ever/ plan on submitting kernel patches? i used to use
lm_sensors on 2.2 cause it was fairly painless - but just havn't
bothered with 2.4 cause it was a pita when i tried.

i know they talked AC at some point about getting a patch in, but
nothing seems to have come from it.

what a damm damm shame. we've got code that appears to work really
well[1] to drive most of the hardware sensors out there - but the
code is used by only a tiny fraction of linux users cause these guys
/apparently/ would much rather keep themselves and their code
isolated in some god forsaken CVS server rather than submit their
code to Linus.

fscking shame.

-- 
Paul Jakma	paul@clubi.ie	paul@jakma.org
PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt
-------------------------------------------
Fortune:
Ten persons who speak make more noise than ten thousand who are silent.
		-- Napoleon I

[1]. i only had very slight problems with module ref counts earlier
in its devel cycle.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

[Alan Cox]

> do these guys /ever/ plan on submitting kernel patches? i used to use
> lm_sensors on 2.2 cause it was fairly painless - but just havn't
> bothered with 2.4 cause it was a pita when i tried.

Its in 2.4 it wont be in 2.2 I suspect


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

[Mohammad A. Haque]

It's in 2.4? Where?

Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > do these guys /ever/ plan on submitting kernel patches? i used to use
> > lm_sensors on 2.2 cause it was fairly painless - but just havn't
> > bothered with 2.4 cause it was a pita when i tried.
> 
> Its in 2.4 it wont be in 2.2 I suspect

-- 

=====================================================================
Mohammad A. Haque                              http://www.haque.net/ 
                                               mhaque@haque.net

  "Alcohol and calculus don't mix.             Project Lead
   Don't drink and derive." --Unknown          http://wm.themes.org/
                                               batmanppc@themes.org
=====================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

[Paul Jakma]

On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> Its in 2.4 it wont be in 2.2 I suspect

it is? i don't see the sensors stuff, so you must mean just the i2c
bits. Any word on whether we'll see sensors code go in to 2.4?

like i said, their code has worked well for me, but they seem intent
on keeping it as obscure as possible... (i remember someone posted to
l-k that they'd started a sensors project, and had code for the LM80.
he wasn't at all aware of lm_sensors!).

regards,
-- 
Paul Jakma	paul@clubi.ie	paul@jakma.org
PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt
-------------------------------------------
Fortune:
Some programming languages manage to absorb change, but withstand progress.
		-- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

[Alan Cox]

> it is? i don't see the sensors stuff, so you must mean just the i2c
> bits. Any word on whether we'll see sensors code go in to 2.4?

The i2c bits

> like i said, their code has worked well for me, but they seem intent
> on keeping it as obscure as possible... (i remember someone posted to

No idea on the sensors stuff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

[Dan Hollis]

On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > like i said, their code has worked well for me, but they seem intent
> > on keeping it as obscure as possible... (i remember someone posted to
> No idea on the sensors stuff

Whats keeping lm78 from being integrated into 2.4?

-Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

[Paul Jakma]

On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> No idea on the sensors stuff

i'll go nag them again. :)

regards,
-- 
Paul Jakma	paul@clubi.ie	paul@jakma.org
PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt
-------------------------------------------
Fortune:
You will lose an important disk file.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

[Gregory Maxwell]

On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 04:55:02PM -0000, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> This probably is not the right lpace, but can't think of where else to ask
> 
> Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate the
> enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many motherboards provide
> via their bios's ?
> 
> Please point me in the right direction

<points at freshmeat.net>
lmsensors
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

[adrian]

Hello,

  I have a patch for lm_sensors to match changes in 2.4.0-testxx.  It is
available at:

http://www.lostland.net/~jimbud/patches/lm_sensors-2.5.2-2.4.x.patch.gz

Regards,
Adrian

On 10 Dec 2000, Graham Murray wrote:

> Peter Samuelson <peter@cadcamlab.org> writes:
>
> > [Andrew Stubbs]
> > > Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate
> > > the enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many
> > > motherboards provide via their bios's ?
> >
> > Do a search on 'lm_sensors'.
>
> Does this work with the latest 2.4.0-testxx kernels. It stopped
> working for me quite a few kernel tests ago.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

[Jonathan Hudson]

In article <m2aea42ock.fsf@barnowl.demon.co.uk>,
	Graham Murray <graham@barnowl.demon.co.uk> writes:
GM> Peter Samuelson <peter@cadcamlab.org> writes:
GM> 
>> [Andrew Stubbs]
>> > Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate
>> > the enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many
>> > motherboards provide via their bios's ?
>> 
>> Do a search on 'lm_sensors'.
GM> 
GM> Does this work with the latest 2.4.0-testxx kernels. It stopped
GM> working for me quite a few kernel tests ago.

lm_sensors-2.5.4 is working fine here with 2.4.0t12p7 here (MSI mobo, VIA
stuff).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/