* kernel-doc minor fix
@ 2000-12-16 14:41 Jani Monoses
2000-12-17 16:22 ` Simon Huggins
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jani Monoses @ 2000-12-16 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: twaugh; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi
inline docs are not generated for functions which return a 'const'
because this modifier is not checked for (only inline extern and static)
when verifying the function prototype.
This patch fixes it and hopefully doesn't break anything else(I am
Perl----)
Jani.
--- /usr/src/linux/scripts/kernel-doc Tue Dec 12 11:25:59 2000
+++ kernel-doc Sat Dec 16 15:53:17 2000
@@ -664,10 +664,11 @@
##
# takes a function prototype and spits out all the details
-# stored in the global arrays/hsahes.
+# stored in the global arrays/hashes.
sub dump_function {
my $prototype = shift @_;
+ $prototype =~ s/^const+ //;
$prototype =~ s/^static+ //;
$prototype =~ s/^extern+ //;
$prototype =~ s/^inline+ //;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel-doc minor fix
2000-12-16 14:41 kernel-doc minor fix Jani Monoses
@ 2000-12-17 16:22 ` Simon Huggins
2000-12-18 9:04 ` Jani Monoses
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Simon Huggins @ 2000-12-17 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: twaugh
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 04:41:44PM +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
> --- /usr/src/linux/scripts/kernel-doc Tue Dec 12 11:25:59 2000
> +++ kernel-doc Sat Dec 16 15:53:17 2000
> @@ -664,10 +664,11 @@
> ##
> # takes a function prototype and spits out all the details
> -# stored in the global arrays/hsahes.
> +# stored in the global arrays/hashes.
> sub dump_function {
> my $prototype = shift @_;
> + $prototype =~ s/^const+ //;
> $prototype =~ s/^static+ //;
> $prototype =~ s/^extern+ //;
> $prototype =~ s/^inline+ //;
Since when did C accept constttttttttttttttttttt and staticcccccccc?
etc.
Should that be " +" not "+ " or is someone just trying to confuse me?
Or did someone try to mean s/foo//g by adding a +?
Yours confusedly,
Simon.
--
[ "Therapy is expensive. Popping bubble wrap is cheap. You choose." ]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel-doc minor fix
2000-12-17 16:22 ` Simon Huggins
@ 2000-12-18 9:04 ` Jani Monoses
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jani Monoses @ 2000-12-18 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon Huggins; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Simon Huggins wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 04:41:44PM +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
> > + $prototype =~ s/^const+ //;
> Yours confusedly,
>
> Simon.
Hi
I can't answer to your question but this patch is not good anyway as Tim
pointed out to me.
Jani.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-12-18 9:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-12-16 14:41 kernel-doc minor fix Jani Monoses
2000-12-17 16:22 ` Simon Huggins
2000-12-18 9:04 ` Jani Monoses
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®