From: willy@ldl.fc.hp.com (Matthew Wilcox)
To: james rich <james.rich@m.cc.utah.edu>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@ldl.fc.hp.com>,
"Eric S. Raymond" <esr@thyrsus.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention?
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 22:19:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010419221916.K4217@zumpano.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010419211749.I4217@zumpano.fc.hp.com> <Pine.GSO.4.05.10104192201330.8316-100000@pipt.oz.cc.utah.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10104192201330.8316-100000@pipt.oz.cc.utah.edu>; from james.rich@m.cc.utah.edu on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:07:22PM -0600
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:07:22PM -0600, james rich wrote:
> Doesn't this seem a little like the problems occurring with lvm right now?
> A separate tree maintained with the maintainers not wanting others
> submitting patches that conflict with their particular tree? It seems
> that any project should be able to submit any patch against The One True
> Tree: Linus' tree.
every single architecture has their own development tree. the pa project
has not been running as long as the other ports, and has a large amount of
development going on. i count 28 commits for april (so far), 75 commits
for march, 187 for february and 112 for january (to the kernel tree, other
parts of the port also have commit messages). linus would go insane if
we sent him every single one of those patches individually. and we'd
go insane trying to keep up with what he'd taken and what he'd dropped.
until you've actually tried doing this, please don't attempt to criticise.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-20 4:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-20 2:36 Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-20 3:00 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 3:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-20 4:07 ` james rich
2001-04-20 4:19 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2001-04-20 4:52 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-04-20 5:17 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-20 13:13 ` [parisc-linux] " Alan Cox
2001-04-20 13:35 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 13:43 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-20 13:53 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 14:03 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-20 14:19 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 14:44 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-20 14:59 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 15:51 ` Tom Rini
2001-04-20 16:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-20 16:15 ` Bob McElrath
2001-04-20 16:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-20 19:00 ` Jeff Dike
2001-04-20 18:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-20 21:55 ` Jeff Dike
2001-04-20 18:53 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-04-20 16:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-20 16:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2001-04-20 16:50 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 19:08 ` Russell King
2001-04-21 3:08 ` Tom Leete
2001-04-21 8:53 ` [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone rmk
2001-04-20 18:20 ` [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention? Tom Rini
2001-04-20 18:48 ` Nicolas Pitre
2001-04-20 18:55 ` Tom Rini
2001-04-20 21:19 ` David Woodhouse
2001-04-20 21:24 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 21:29 ` David Woodhouse
2001-04-20 21:35 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 22:53 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-21 0:37 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-21 23:39 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-04-21 12:32 ` David Woodhouse
2001-04-23 21:12 ` [patch] fix broken symbols (was Re: OK, let's try ...) Arjan van de Ven
2001-04-20 21:39 ` [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention? David Woodhouse
2001-04-21 0:24 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 18:50 ` Russell King
2001-04-20 21:23 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-04-21 0:52 ` Proposal for better attribution structure Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 8:19 ` OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention? David Woodhouse
2001-04-20 19:47 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 20:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-20 20:13 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 20:55 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-21 6:48 ` [parisc-linux] " Grant Grundler
2001-04-21 14:52 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 13:08 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-20 13:18 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-07-29 10:47 ` Riley Williams
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-19 22:50 Eric S. Raymond
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010419221916.K4217@zumpano.fc.hp.com \
--to=willy@ldl.fc.hp.com \
--cc=esr@thyrsus.com \
--cc=james.rich@m.cc.utah.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®