mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: esr@thyrsus.com
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox),
	acahalan@cs.uml.edu (Albert D. Cahalan),
	willy@ldl.fc.hp.com (Matthew Wilcox),
	james.rich@m.cc.utah.edu (james rich),
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention?
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 14:43:49 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E14qbCT-0001IF-00@the-village.bc.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010420093538.A5525@thyrsus.com> from "Eric S. Raymond" at Apr 20, 2001 09:35:38 AM

> Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>:
> > I have for one. Its definitely the wrong approach to bomb Linus with patches
> > when doing the merge of an architecture. All the architecture folk with in
> > their own trees for good reason.
> 
> On the other hand, Linus has objected to the One-Big-Patch approach in
> the past with respect to things like the networking and VM code.  How
> are people to know what the right thing is?

Who said anything about one big patch ?

Just because you have a lot of differences doesnt mean you send Linus one giant
splat of code. I don't send Linus -ac for example.

Alan




  reply	other threads:[~2001-04-20 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-20  2:36 Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-20  3:00 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20  3:17   ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-20  4:07     ` james rich
2001-04-20  4:19       ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-20  4:52         ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-04-20  5:17           ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-20 13:13           ` [parisc-linux] " Alan Cox
2001-04-20 13:35             ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 13:43               ` Alan Cox [this message]
2001-04-20 13:53                 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 14:03                   ` Alan Cox
2001-04-20 14:19                     ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 14:44                       ` Alan Cox
2001-04-20 14:59                         ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 15:51                           ` Tom Rini
2001-04-20 16:06                             ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-20 16:15                               ` Bob McElrath
2001-04-20 16:21                                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-20 19:00                                   ` Jeff Dike
2001-04-20 18:47                                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-20 21:55                                       ` Jeff Dike
2001-04-20 18:53                                     ` Jes Sorensen
2001-04-20 16:26                                 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-20 16:35                             ` Nicolas Pitre
2001-04-20 16:50                               ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 19:08                                 ` Russell King
2001-04-21  3:08                                   ` Tom Leete
2001-04-21  8:53                                     ` [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone rmk
2001-04-20 18:20                               ` [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention? Tom Rini
2001-04-20 18:48                                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2001-04-20 18:55                                   ` Tom Rini
2001-04-20 21:19                                   ` David Woodhouse
2001-04-20 21:24                                     ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 21:29                                     ` David Woodhouse
2001-04-20 21:35                                       ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 22:53                                         ` Alan Cox
2001-04-21  0:37                                           ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-21 23:39                                             ` Jes Sorensen
2001-04-21 12:32                                           ` David Woodhouse
2001-04-23 21:12                                             ` [patch] fix broken symbols (was Re: OK, let's try ...) Arjan van de Ven
2001-04-20 21:39                                       ` [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention? David Woodhouse
2001-04-21  0:24                                         ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 18:50                           ` Russell King
2001-04-20 21:23                             ` Andreas Dilger
2001-04-21  0:52                               ` Proposal for better attribution structure Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20  8:19       ` OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention? David Woodhouse
2001-04-20 19:47     ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 20:00       ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-20 20:13         ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 20:55       ` Alan Cox
2001-04-21  6:48       ` [parisc-linux] " Grant Grundler
2001-04-21 14:52         ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-04-20 13:08   ` Alan Cox
2001-04-20 13:18     ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-07-29 10:47     ` Riley Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E14qbCT-0001IF-00@the-village.bc.nu \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=acahalan@cs.uml.edu \
    --cc=esr@thyrsus.com \
    --cc=james.rich@m.cc.utah.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=willy@ldl.fc.hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®