* Re: active after unmount?
@ 2001-04-19 21:51 Brian J. Watson
2001-04-19 21:56 ` Matthew Jacob
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Brian J. Watson @ 2001-04-19 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mjacob, Linux Kernel
> Unmounting a SCSI disk device succeeded, and yielded:
>
> Red Hat Linux release 6.2 (Zoot)
> Kernel 2.4.3 on a 2-processor i686
>
> chico login: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have
> a nice day...
>
This message comes out of kill_super(). I would guess that somebody's
mismanaging VFS refcounts, but there's not enough info here to diagnose the
problem. What filesystem are you using? Is this reproducible? What do you have
to do between mounting and unmounting to reproduce the problem?
--
Brian Watson
Compaq Computer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: active after unmount?
2001-04-19 21:51 active after unmount? Brian J. Watson
@ 2001-04-19 21:56 ` Matthew Jacob
2001-04-19 22:09 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Jacob @ 2001-04-19 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian J. Watson; +Cc: Linux Kernel
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Brian J. Watson wrote:
> > Unmounting a SCSI disk device succeeded, and yielded:
> >
> > Red Hat Linux release 6.2 (Zoot)
> > Kernel 2.4.3 on a 2-processor i686
> >
> > chico login: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have
> > a nice day...
> >
>
>
> This message comes out of kill_super(). I would guess that somebody's
> mismanaging VFS refcounts, but there's not enough info here to diagnose the
> problem. What filesystem are you using? Is this reproducible? What do you have
> to do between mounting and unmounting to reproduce the problem?
>>>>>>ext2<<<<<<, haven't reproduced it yet, on a 2x686 256MB memory,
SCSI midlayer default, with 2.4.3.
-matt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: active after unmount?
2001-04-19 21:56 ` Matthew Jacob
@ 2001-04-19 22:09 ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-19 22:17 ` Matthew Jacob
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2001-04-19 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Jacob; +Cc: Brian J. Watson, Linux Kernel
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 02:56:15PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Brian J. Watson wrote:
>
> > > Unmounting a SCSI disk device succeeded, and yielded:
> > >
> > > Red Hat Linux release 6.2 (Zoot)
> > > Kernel 2.4.3 on a 2-processor i686
> > >
> > > chico login: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have
> > > a nice day...
> > >
> >
> >
> > This message comes out of kill_super(). I would guess that somebody's
> > mismanaging VFS refcounts, but there's not enough info here to diagnose the
> > problem. What filesystem are you using? Is this reproducible? What do you have
> > to do between mounting and unmounting to reproduce the problem?
>
> >>>>>>ext2<<<<<<, haven't reproduced it yet, on a 2x686 256MB memory,
> SCSI midlayer default, with 2.4.3.
I've seen it a lot with the autofs. You can check what it is with the
following small debug patch.
Index: fs/inode.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/linux/fs/inode.c,v
retrieving revision 1.122
diff -u -u -r1.122 inode.c
--- fs/inode.c 2001/03/24 09:36:25 1.122
+++ fs/inode.c 2001/04/19 22:07:17
@@ -443,6 +443,13 @@
count++;
continue;
}
+#if 1
+ printk("inode %u:%lu busy\n", inode->i_dev, inode->i_ino);
+ if (inode->i_dentry.next != &inode->i_dentry)
+ printk("for file %s\n",
+ list_entry(inode->i_dentry.next, struct dentry, d_alias)->d_name.name);
+#endif
+
busy = 1;
}
/* only unused inodes may be cached with i_count zero */
-Andi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: active after unmount?
2001-04-19 22:09 ` Andi Kleen
@ 2001-04-19 22:17 ` Matthew Jacob
2001-04-20 0:41 ` Alexander Viro
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Jacob @ 2001-04-19 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: Brian J. Watson, Linux Kernel
'kay, great, thanks.. I'll put it in and see if things show up again
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: active after unmount?
2001-04-19 22:17 ` Matthew Jacob
@ 2001-04-20 0:41 ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-20 3:22 ` Matthew Jacob
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Viro @ 2001-04-20 0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Jacob; +Cc: Andi Kleen, Brian J. Watson, Linux Kernel
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> 'kay, great, thanks.. I'll put it in and see if things show up again
Guys, it's a known bug, fixed in 2.4.4-pre3. See the change to fs/super.c
between 2.4.4-pre2 and 2.4.4-pre3 - it's quite small.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: active after unmount?
2001-04-20 0:41 ` Alexander Viro
@ 2001-04-20 3:22 ` Matthew Jacob
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Jacob @ 2001-04-20 3:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Viro; +Cc: Andi Kleen, Brian J. Watson, Linux Kernel
Double cool then.
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> >
> > 'kay, great, thanks.. I'll put it in and see if things show up again
>
> Guys, it's a known bug, fixed in 2.4.4-pre3. See the change to fs/super.c
> between 2.4.4-pre2 and 2.4.4-pre3 - it's quite small.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* active after unmount?
@ 2001-04-17 15:40 Matthew Jacob
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Jacob @ 2001-04-17 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Unmounting a SCSI disk device succeeded, and yielded:
Red Hat Linux release 6.2 (Zoot)
Kernel 2.4.3 on a 2-processor i686
chico login: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have
a nice day...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-04-20 3:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-04-19 21:51 active after unmount? Brian J. Watson
2001-04-19 21:56 ` Matthew Jacob
2001-04-19 22:09 ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-19 22:17 ` Matthew Jacob
2001-04-20 0:41 ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-20 3:22 ` Matthew Jacob
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-17 15:40 Matthew Jacob
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®