From: Hendrik Volker Brunn <hvb@gmx.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: pdc20267 both channels share one IRQ
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 10:12:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010504101219.A300@sonne.glowinginthesun> (raw)
Is it ok for an Promise Ultra 100 to have both channels
assigned the same IRQ?
I have one DTLA-307030 attached as master to each channel
and get transfer rates at around 12 - 16 MB/s.
As I have heard people reporting transfer rates of about 24 - 28 MB/s
I was wondering if there were some connections.
Is it me just being dumb and ignoring obvious facts or something
misconfigured weirdly with my system?
Hendrik
I'm subscribed.
--
"And I'm right. I'm always right, but in this case I'm just a bit more
right than I usually am" -- Linus Torvald, Sunday Aug 27, 2000.
## Linux 2.4.4 running on an i586 ##
reply other threads:[~2001-05-04 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010504101219.A300@sonne.glowinginthesun \
--to=hvb@gmx.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®