* eepro100 rev 12 problems
@ 2001-05-17 15:59 James Fidell
2001-05-17 19:08 ` Ion Badulescu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Fidell @ 2001-05-17 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I have two eepro100 interfaces in a machine, one rev 8, which works just
fine, and another rev 12, which appears as a device when the kernel boots
and can be configured with an IP address etc., but I can't get any data
in or out of it. All the other hardware looks like it's working fine and
all my rev 8 cards work, so I'm led to ask, are there any known problems
with eepro100 rev 12 cards under 2.2.18?
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: eepro100 rev 12 problems
2001-05-17 15:59 eepro100 rev 12 problems James Fidell
@ 2001-05-17 19:08 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-05-17 23:31 ` James Fidell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ion Badulescu @ 2001-05-17 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Fidell; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Thu, 17 May 2001 16:59:04 +0100, James Fidell <james@cloud9.co.uk> wrote:
> I have two eepro100 interfaces in a machine, one rev 8, which works just
> fine, and another rev 12, which appears as a device when the kernel boots
> and can be configured with an IP address etc., but I can't get any data
> in or out of it. All the other hardware looks like it's working fine and
> all my rev 8 cards work, so I'm led to ask, are there any known problems
> with eepro100 rev 12 cards under 2.2.18?
Is this a real card, or is it built-in on the motherboard?
I don't think eepro100 has got much testing with rev > 9, though it should
have worked. All eepro100 chips are supposed to be backwards compatible with
the 82557, but maybe our driver initializes some registers in a way that
upsets newer chips. Not having docs for the newer chips doesn't help, either...
Intel's own e100 driver probably works, their code does things differently if
rev >= 12 (what they call the D102 revision). Give it a spin, I guess.
Ion
--
It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
than to open it and remove all doubt.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: eepro100 rev 12 problems
2001-05-17 19:08 ` Ion Badulescu
@ 2001-05-17 23:31 ` James Fidell
2001-05-17 23:55 ` Ion Badulescu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Fidell @ 2001-05-17 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ion Badulescu; +Cc: linux-kernel
Quoting Ion Badulescu (ionut@moisil.cs.columbia.edu):
> On Thu, 17 May 2001 16:59:04 +0100, James Fidell <james@cloud9.co.uk> wrote:
> > I have two eepro100 interfaces in a machine, one rev 8, which works just
> > fine, and another rev 12, which appears as a device when the kernel boots
> > and can be configured with an IP address etc., but I can't get any data
> > in or out of it. All the other hardware looks like it's working fine and
> > all my rev 8 cards work, so I'm led to ask, are there any known problems
> > with eepro100 rev 12 cards under 2.2.18?
>
> Is this a real card, or is it built-in on the motherboard?
It's a real card.
> I don't think eepro100 has got much testing with rev > 9, though it should
> have worked. All eepro100 chips are supposed to be backwards compatible with
> the 82557, but maybe our driver initializes some registers in a way that
> upsets newer chips. Not having docs for the newer chips doesn't help,
> either...
>
> Intel's own e100 driver probably works, their code does things differently if
> rev >= 12 (what they call the D102 revision). Give it a spin, I guess.
For various reasons that are far to boring to go into here, I'm not entirely
free in my choice of card. What I'll probably do is try to get a rev 8 card
swapped in for the rev 12 one. If I can't get a rev 8 card for that machine,
I'll go with the e100 driver and let you know what happens.
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: eepro100 rev 12 problems
2001-05-17 23:31 ` James Fidell
@ 2001-05-17 23:55 ` Ion Badulescu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ion Badulescu @ 2001-05-17 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Fidell; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Fri, 18 May 2001, James Fidell wrote:
> > Is this a real card, or is it built-in on the motherboard?
>
> It's a real card.
All right, that's good to know. Maybe I'll get one for myself, so I can
test new code on it -- right now I only have rev 9 and earlier cards.
> For various reasons that are far to boring to go into here, I'm not entirely
> free in my choice of card. What I'll probably do is try to get a rev 8 card
> swapped in for the rev 12 one. If I can't get a rev 8 card for that machine,
> I'll go with the e100 driver and let you know what happens.
Yes, and do let us know what happens. Whatever the problem is, it wants
fixing sooner than later.
Thanks,
Ion
--
It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
than to open it and remove all doubt.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-05-17 23:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-05-17 15:59 eepro100 rev 12 problems James Fidell
2001-05-17 19:08 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-05-17 23:31 ` James Fidell
2001-05-17 23:55 ` Ion Badulescu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®