From: Ragnar Hojland Espinosa <ragnar@ragnar-hojland.com>
To: Bill Pringlemeir <bpringle@sympatico.ca>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Ronald Bultje <rbultje@ronald.bitfreak.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: >128 MB RAM stability problems (again)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 08:37:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010705083729.A2414@ragnar-hojland.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E15HsKg-0001Pk-00@the-village.bc.nu> <m2sngc3w10.fsf@sympatico.ca>
In-Reply-To: <m2sngc3w10.fsf@sympatico.ca>; from bpringle@sympatico.ca on Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 11:16:43PM -0400
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 11:16:43PM -0400, Bill Pringlemeir wrote:
> I also have had problems with a machine that had 128Mb + 64 Mb. I
> discovered the following about 2.4.x. You _should_ have a swap file
> that is double RAM. Mixing different SDRAM types is probably a bad
> thing. So if you upgraded, then that might be problematic.
And here's a counter claim: At home have 128 + 64, both of different speeds
and brands. Of course, to run properly you have to force the pc100 to run at
66, but other than that they're happy (96MB swap)
--
____/| Ragnar Højland Freedom - Linux - OpenGL | Brainbench MVP
\ o.O| PGP94C4B2F0D27DE025BE2302C104B78C56 B72F0822 | for Unix Programming
=(_)= "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for | (www.brainbench.com)
U chaos and madness await thee at its end."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-05 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-04 20:45 Ronald Bultje
2001-07-04 19:11 ` J Sloan
2001-07-04 19:20 ` Charles Cazabon
2001-07-04 19:29 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-04 19:47 ` William Scott Lockwood III
2001-07-05 3:16 ` Bill Pringlemeir
2001-07-05 6:37 ` Ragnar Hojland Espinosa [this message]
2001-07-05 15:38 ` Bill Pringlemeir
2001-07-04 19:44 ` mark
2001-07-04 20:01 ` Jeffrey W. Baker
2001-07-04 20:05 ` George Bonser
2001-07-04 22:11 ` D. Stimits
2001-07-04 23:47 ` Peter Bornemann
2001-07-05 1:22 ` Reza Roboubi
2001-07-05 1:43 ` Charles Cazabon
2001-07-05 1:58 ` George Bonser
2001-07-05 15:51 ` Don Krause
2001-07-05 17:22 ` Gary White (Network Administrator)
2001-07-05 20:45 ` Peter A. Castro
2001-07-06 17:55 ` Ronald Bultje
2001-07-09 14:24 ` Andreas Bombe
[not found] <01Jul4.172916edt.62972@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca>
2001-07-05 8:44 ` Ronald Bultje
2001-07-04 20:57 ` Chris Bacott
2001-07-05 7:22 ` StarTux
2001-07-05 8:40 ` Reza Roboubi
2001-07-05 9:15 ` D. Stimits
2001-07-05 10:50 ` Ronald Bultje
2001-07-05 15:41 ` Reza Roboubi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-04 20:06 Alessandro Motter Ren
2001-07-04 20:16 ` George Bonser
2001-07-04 20:52 ` Ronald Bultje
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010705083729.A2414@ragnar-hojland.com \
--to=ragnar@ragnar-hojland.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bpringle@sympatico.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rbultje@ronald.bitfreak.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®