Re: >128 MB RAM stability problems (again)

["William Scott Lockwood III" <thatlinuxguy@hotmail.com>]

Ditto.  One with 320, one with 256 and one with 192.  All dual booting Win98
or Win2k and Mandrake 8.0 with 2.4.3.

Scott

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Ronald Bultje" <rbultje@ronald.bitfreak.net>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: >128 MB RAM stability problems (again)


> > I'm kind of astounded now, WHY can't linux-2.4.x run on ANY machine in
> > my house with more than 128 MB RAM?!? Can someone please point out to me
>
> Can I suggest you change your memory vendor and/or get an antistatic wrist
> strap ?
>
> > that he's actually running kernel-2.4.x on a machine with more than 128
> > MB RAM and that he's NOT having severe stability problems?
>
> Multiple boxes, all solid with 256Mb
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>