From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Cc: tao@acc.umu.se, matthias.andree@gmx.de, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
wietse@porcupine.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ioctl SIOCGIFNETMASK: ip alias bug 2.4.9 and 2.2.19
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 22:40:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010910224002.31693@colin.muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010910100537.W26627@khan.acc.umu.se> <200109101936.XAA00707@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
In-Reply-To: <200109101936.XAA00707@ms2.inr.ac.ru>; from kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru on Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 09:36:20PM +0200
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 09:36:20PM +0200, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> And I see no reasons to refuse this: it evidently improves the things
> almost without efforts.
Doubtful.
> No matter that this imporvement is not so useful,
> as it would happen if I guessed this way from the very beginning.
That's a polite way to express it.
> So that applications will have to worry about compatibility with older
> kernels in any case.
Just hope then that no ifconfig or other binary has a two on the stack
when calling this.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-10 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20010906155920.B29583@maggie.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
[not found] ` <200109061554.TAA11031@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
2001-09-06 17:48 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-06 18:06 ` kuznet
2001-09-06 18:18 ` Wietse Venema
2001-09-06 18:38 ` kuznet
2001-09-06 19:45 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-06 19:59 ` Wietse Venema
2001-09-06 20:20 ` jamal
2001-09-06 20:41 ` Wietse Venema
2001-09-06 20:44 ` jamal
2001-09-06 21:20 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-07 6:11 ` Patrick Schaaf
2001-09-07 9:24 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-09-07 11:13 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-08 13:25 ` Kai Henningsen
2001-09-06 20:22 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-06 20:38 ` Wietse Venema
2001-09-10 16:11 ` Dennis
2001-09-06 20:13 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-10 8:05 ` David Weinehall
2001-09-10 12:26 ` Wietse Venema
2001-09-10 12:53 ` David Weinehall
2001-09-10 13:52 ` Wietse Venema
2001-09-10 15:18 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-10 15:12 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-10 19:36 ` kuznet
2001-09-10 20:14 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-11 15:22 ` kuznet
2001-09-11 16:39 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-10 20:40 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2001-09-10 21:19 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-11 11:26 ` Matthias Andree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010910224002.31693@colin.muc.de \
--to=ak@muc.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.andree@gmx.de \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=tao@acc.umu.se \
--cc=wietse@porcupine.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®