From: "Dieter Nützel" <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
To: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>, Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: Oliver Xymoron <oxymoron@waste.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
Roger Larsson <roger.larsson@norran.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:09:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010922211919Z272247-760+15646@vger.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0109201659210.5622-100000@waste.org> <1001042255.7291.39.camel@phantasy> <3BAB614E.8600D074@mvista.com>
In-Reply-To: <3BAB614E.8600D074@mvista.com>
Am Freitag, 21. September 2001 17:48 schrieb george anzinger:
> Robert Love wrote:
> > On Thu, 2001-09-20 at 18:51, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > > > Does your audio source depend on any files (eg mp3s) and if so, could
> > > > they be moved to a ramfs? Do the skips go away then?
> > >
> > > Good point.
> > >
> > > I've copied one video (MP2) and one Ogg-Vorbis file into /dev/shm.
> > > Little bit better but hiccup still there :-(
> >
> > As I've been saying, the problem really shouldn't be disk I/O. I would
> > think (and really hope) the readahead code can fit a little mp3 in
> > memory. Even if not, its a quick read to load it. The continued blips
> > you see are caused by something, well, continual :)
>
> Are you running your application at some real time priority? I suspect
> that, when dbench starts, it floods the system with a lot of new tasks
> and the system must visit each one until it gets back to your ap. Nice
> will only do so much here. Real time priority is the way to go.
> Attached are a couple of small programs to help here. "rt" runs a given
> ap at a given priority. I.e. > rt 10 foo, runs foo at priority 10.
> (There are more options, try rt -h.) getrt reports the priority of a
> task. If you do something like > rt 10 bash everything you run from
> the new bash prompt will be at priority 10. You must be root to run rt
Yes, I do like I've posted in all the related threads.
Here is some more input for you. I hope it could help nail it down.
Regards,
Dieter
BTW I'll now switching to 2.4.10-pre14
SunWave1#time tar xIf /Pakete/Linux/linux-2.4.9.tar.bz2
34.570u 5.350s 0:47.84 83.4% 0+0k 0+0io 295pf+0w
I "hear" some have disk activities (disk trashing).
SunWave1#sync
Runs for ages!!!
User CPU 0%
System CPU 0%
Idle CPU 99%
So where did it wait???
Here comes what latencytimes show:
Worst 20 latency times of 5061 measured in this period.
usec cause mask start line/file address end line/file
322263 reacqBKL 1 1375/sched.c c01138b4 697/sched.c
216174 BKL 1 30/inode.c c016b971 52/inode.c
158328 BKL 9 742/block_dev.c c0144d51 697/sched.c
66975 BKL 1 1101/super.c c014250d 697/sched.c
53560 BKL 1 1101/super.c c014250d 1130/super.c
37742 spin_lock 1 547/sched.c c0111b04 795/block_dev.c
24822 spin_lock 1 678/inode.c c01551f7 704/inode.c
24739 spin_lock 1 291/buffer.c c014003c 285/buffer.c
19330 spin_lock 1 547/sched.c c0111b04 697/sched.c
16566 BKL 1 30/inode.c c016b971 697/sched.c
14049 spin_lock 1 2043/tcp_ipv6.c e9078837 119/softirq.c
11993 spin_lock 1 2111/tcp_ipv4.c c0220517 119/softirq.c
11704 BKL 1 706/block_dev.c c0144bd7 1381/sched.c
11405 spin_lock 1 291/buffer.c c014003c 280/buffer.c
11288 BKL 1 706/block_dev.c c0144bd7 697/sched.c
11213 reacqBKL 9 1375/sched.c c01138b4 696/block_dev.c
11212 spin_lock 1 547/sched.c c0111b04 696/block_dev.c
7552 spin_lock 1 298/buffer.c c013bb1c 285/buffer.c
5013 BKL 0 2763/buffer.c c013fbca 697/sched.c
4641 BKL 1 1302/inode.c c016de79 697/sched.c
SunWave1#ksymoops -m /boot/System.map -A " c01138b4 c016b971 c0144d51
c014250d c014250d c0111b04 c01551f7 c014003c c0111b04 c016b971 e9078837
c0220517 c0144bd7 c014003c c0144bd7 c01138b4 c0111b04 c013bb1c c013fbca
c016de79"
ksymoops 2.4.3 on i686 2.4.10-pre12-preempt. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.10-pre12-preempt/ (default)
-m /boot/System.map (specified)
Adhoc c01138b4 <preempt_schedule+34/b0>
Adhoc c016b970 <reiserfs_delete_inode+30/110>
Adhoc c0144d50 <blkdev_close+60/1b0>
Adhoc c014250c <kill_super+ac/280>
Adhoc c014250c <kill_super+ac/280>
Adhoc c0111b04 <schedule+34/550>
Adhoc c01551f6 <prune_icache+36/160>
Adhoc c014003c <kupdate+11c/210>
Adhoc c0111b04 <schedule+34/550>
Adhoc c016b970 <reiserfs_delete_inode+30/110>
Adhoc e9078836 <[ipv6]tcp6_get_info+4a6/770>
Adhoc c0220516 <tcp_get_info+4b6/7a0>
Adhoc c0144bd6 <blkdev_put+46/160>
Adhoc c014003c <kupdate+11c/210>
Adhoc c0144bd6 <blkdev_put+46/160>
Adhoc c01138b4 <preempt_schedule+34/b0>
Adhoc c0111b04 <schedule+34/550>
Adhoc c013bb1c <wait_for_locked_buffers+3c/60>
Adhoc c013fbca <sync_old_buffers+2a/130>
Adhoc c016de78 <reiserfs_dirty_inode+58/f0>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-22 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200109200758.f8K7wEG13675@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-19 22:44 ` Robert Love
2001-09-20 1:40 ` Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
2001-09-20 2:23 ` safemode
2001-09-20 1:13 ` David Lang
2001-09-20 2:57 ` Robert Love
2001-09-20 2:38 ` Robert Love
2001-09-20 6:31 ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-20 6:31 ` Dieter Nützel
[not found] ` <20010920063143.424BD1E41A@Cantor.suse.de>
2001-09-20 6:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 7:57 ` Dieter Nützel
[not found] ` <20010920075751.6CA791E6B2@Cantor.suse.de>
2001-09-20 8:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 20:13 ` george anzinger
2001-09-20 20:38 ` Randy.Dunlap
2001-09-20 21:10 ` Robert Love
2001-09-20 21:35 ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-20 22:03 ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-09-20 22:51 ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-21 3:17 ` Robert Love
2001-09-21 15:48 ` george anzinger
2001-09-22 21:09 ` Dieter Nützel [this message]
2001-09-22 23:40 ` safemode
2001-09-22 23:46 ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-23 0:15 ` safemode
2001-09-23 0:42 ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-23 2:50 ` Robert Love
2001-09-23 3:14 ` george anzinger
2001-09-23 4:06 ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-23 2:54 ` Robert Love
2001-09-27 0:02 ` [reiserfs-list] " Dieter Nützel
2001-09-23 2:58 ` Robert Love
[not found] ` <200109222340.BAA37547@blipp.internet5.net>
2001-09-23 0:38 ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-23 1:42 ` safemode
2001-09-23 3:02 ` Robert Love
2001-09-23 16:43 ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-23 2:44 ` Robert Love
[not found] ` <200109200757.JAA60995@blipp.internet5.net>
2001-09-20 17:37 ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-20 21:29 ` Robert Love
2001-09-20 21:53 ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-20 21:09 ` Robert Love
2001-09-20 20:01 ` Tobias Diedrich
2001-09-20 20:27 ` Robert Love
2001-09-20 22:09 ` [PATCH] Preemption patch 2.4.9-ac12 Robert Love
2001-09-20 22:01 ` [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool Robert Love
2001-09-22 3:57 ` Andre Pang
2001-09-22 6:10 ` Robert Love
2001-09-22 7:22 ` Andre Pang
2001-09-23 3:18 ` george anzinger
2001-09-23 3:21 ` Robert Love
2001-09-22 12:56 ` ksoftirqd? (Was: Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool) Roger Larsson
2001-09-22 13:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-22 20:51 ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-22 21:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-23 7:05 ` [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool Robert Love
2001-09-23 12:03 ` Andre Pang
2001-09-23 18:31 ` Robert Love
[not found] <200109202253.RAA21082@waste.org>
2001-09-20 23:15 ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-09-21 0:42 ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-21 1:03 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-21 1:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-21 1:51 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-21 1:38 ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-21 1:53 ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-21 2:08 ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-21 2:29 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-21 16:24 ` Jussi Laako
2001-09-21 16:36 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-21 18:46 ` Thomas Sailer
2001-09-22 10:30 ` Jussi Laako
2001-09-21 16:18 ` Stefan Westerfeld
2001-09-21 20:18 ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-21 21:47 ` Robert Love
2002-04-09 5:23 [PATCH] preemption latency measurement tool Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010922211919Z272247-760+15646@vger.kernel.org \
--to=dieter.nuetzel@hamburg.de \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oxymoron@waste.org \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=roger.larsson@norran.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®