From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Doug McNaught <doug@wireboard.com>
Cc: Lew Wolfgang <wolfgang@sweet-haven.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Dump corrupts ext2?
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:38:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011010173811.C3795@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110101558210.7049-100000@train.sweet-haven.com> <m3elob3xao.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org>
In-Reply-To: <m3elob3xao.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org>
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 07:11:43PM -0400, Doug McNaught wrote:
> Lew Wolfgang <wolfgang@sweet-haven.com> writes:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I was looking for some scripts to backup ext2 partitions
> > to multiple CDR's when I stumbled onto "cdbackup" at
> > http://www.cableone.net/ccondit/cdbackup/.
> >
> > Alas, there is a warning saying:
> >
> > "WARNING! When using this program under Linux, be sure not to use
> > dump with kernels in the 2.4.x series. Using dump on an ext2
> > filesystem has a very high potential for causing filesystem
> > corruption. As of kernel version 2.4.5, this has not been
> > resolved, and it may not be for some time."
> >
> > I don't recall any problems like this, does anyone have
> > additional comments?
>
> I'm pretty sure this is because dump reads the block device directly
> (which is cached in the buffer cache), while the file data for cached
> files lives in the page cache, and the two caches are no longer
> coherent (as of 2.4).
>
IIRC, 2.2 didn't have a coherent buffer and page cache also.
I.E. if you "cat /dev/hda > /dev/null" you wouldn't be able to expect any
speedup when reading through the mounted filesystem (except for meta-data?).
Am I wrong? Has Linux ever had a coherent page and buffer cache?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-11 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-10 23:03 Lew Wolfgang
2001-10-10 23:11 ` Doug McNaught
2001-10-10 23:34 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-10 23:55 ` Doug McNaught
2001-10-11 1:48 ` Chris Mason
2001-10-11 4:16 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-10-11 4:29 ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-11 11:47 ` Chris Mason
2001-10-11 2:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-10-11 3:13 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-11 0:38 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2001-10-11 5:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-10-11 1:33 ` Richard Gooch
2001-10-11 4:25 ` Richard Gooch
2001-10-10 23:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011010173811.C3795@mikef-linux.matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=doug@wireboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wolfgang@sweet-haven.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®