* Re: Re: Dilemma: Replace Escalade with Adaptec 2400A or Promise Super
@ 2001-10-11 14:18 jkniiv
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: jkniiv @ 2001-10-11 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Alan Cox, Bonds, Deanna
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 22:25:43 +0100 (BST), Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>> We have monitoring/management tools available from http://linux.adaptec.com
>> . It is the dptapps package. They are not open source but they are tested
>> and released for various distributions of Linux.
>
>Question: What is involved in persuading ADaPTec to provide at least enough
>information for the basic monitoring facilities - so that either the kenrel
>or open source tools can be written to log errors, triggere rebuilds etc
>from the command line ?
>
>Alan
Yes, as always a valid concern. We need the resilience of open source drivers. And simple monitoring shouldn't be seen as added value.
// Jarkko
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Hush 2.0
wlsEARECABsFAjvFqgUUHGprbmlpdkBodXNobWFpbC5jb20ACgkQlshdxPYU0CYzJgCg
s09sdSEdy0TOzTLDI9nUUt5ZRbsAnjM1ojJQqHDrGF5pD5bcBf/T2Uih
=slnC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2001-10-11 19:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-10-11 14:18 Re: Dilemma: Replace Escalade with Adaptec 2400A or Promise Super jkniiv
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®