From: Samium Gromoff <_deepfire@mail.ru>
To: urban@teststation.com (Urban Widmark)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.12-ac4 10Mbit NE2k interrupt load kills p166
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 06:57:42 +0400 (MSD) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200110260257.f9Q2vhg09527@vegae.deep.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110252253270.7785-100000@cola.teststation.com> from "Urban Widmark" at Oct 25, 2001 11:19:51 PM
" Urban Widmark wrote:"
> > Hello folks...
> >
> > Host A: p166, ISA NE2K, linux-2.4.12-ac4
> > Host B: p2-400, rtl-8129, WinXP (heh, not my box though ;)
> >
> > Load: smbmount connection from host A to the host B, and getting
> > large files.
>
> You don't say if any of the tests you did are related to smbfs. I suspect
> this reasoning is completely irrelevant (not, that it has stopped me
> before ... :)
>
> smbfs is not the fastest thing around. I think the slowness on some
> operations is related to how it waits after sending each request.
>
> process A process B
> get semaphore
> request 4096 bytes wait on semaphore
> ... wait for network ...
> read packet
> read packet
> read packet
> release semaphore
> get semaphore
> request 4096 bytes
>
> It could send the second request without waiting for the first to complete
> (if it knew how to separate the responses). Doing that should speed things
> up.
>
> If you play mp3's over smbfs while also doing something else I suppose the
> delay could become noticable. I can't explain the other effects, so
> possibly this is unrelated to smbfs.
>
> You could make me happy by repeating the tests, but generating the network
> load with something else (http?).
>
> /Urban
>
>
>
1. /dev/hda is -u1d1 `ed, and the disc load is near to not existent
2. mp3 is placed locally
cheers, Samium Gromoff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-26 2:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-25 19:30 Samium Gromoff
2001-10-25 20:01 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-10-25 20:22 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-25 20:40 ` Martin Josefsson
2001-10-25 20:54 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-25 20:52 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-12-08 21:58 ` Samium Gromoff
2001-12-10 10:54 ` vda
2001-10-27 15:22 ` Jussi Laako
2001-10-27 15:50 ` Samium Gromoff
2001-10-25 20:21 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-25 21:19 ` Urban Widmark
2001-10-26 2:57 ` Samium Gromoff [this message]
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112091619190.6428-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2001-12-09 21:50 ` Samium Gromoff
2001-12-09 22:18 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-09 23:04 Samium Gromoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200110260257.f9Q2vhg09527@vegae.deep.net \
--to=_deepfire@mail.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urban@teststation.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®