mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@it.uc3m.es>
To: alain@linux.lu
Cc: "linux kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Poor floppy performance in kernel 2.4.10
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 21:57:59 +0100 (MET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200110282057.f9SKvxo15573@oboe.it.uc3m.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200110282040.f9SKe6M02113@hitchhiker.org.lu> from "Alain Knaff" at "Oct 28, 2001 09:40:05 pm"

"A month of sundays ago Alain Knaff wrote:"
> Appended to this mail is the "long live the struct block_device"
> patch. It includes the stuff covered in the last patch as well. The
> issue of stopping transfers in progress is not yet addressed.

Errr .. haven't read the patches. But are you doing something so that
the semantics of the action taken after a media check fails can
be overridden? The current invalidate_inodes is too strong for me,
since I am proxying a remote device, and I don't want to kill 
_all_ the local file descriptors when the remote media disappears. 
I need to at least continue to send down local ioctls!

No, no suggestions of an extra control device, please. Simplicity.

> +
>  static struct block_device_operations floppy_fops = {
>  	open:			floppy_open,
>  	release:		floppy_release,
>  	ioctl:			fd_ioctl,
>  	check_media_change:	check_floppy_change,
>  	revalidate:		floppy_revalidate,
> +	can_trust_media_change: floppy_can_trust_media_change
>  };

and I'd like to have "invalidate" as a method too.

Peter

  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-28 20:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-27 15:00 Alain Knaff
2001-10-27 15:15 ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 17:12   ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-27 17:42     ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 18:00       ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-27 18:13         ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 18:26         ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 19:02           ` more devfs fun Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 19:16             ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 19:50               ` more devfs fun (Piled Higher and Deeper) Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 20:06                 ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 21:09                   ` Ryan Cumming
2001-10-27 21:22                     ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-28  1:00                     ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-28  8:45                     ` Richard Gooch
2001-10-28  9:54                       ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-28 12:27                       ` Roman Zippel
2001-10-28 13:16                         ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-28 22:31                       ` Richard Gooch
2001-10-28 23:11                         ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 21:01                 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-06  6:35                 ` Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  7:10                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-06  7:14                   ` Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  7:17                     ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-06 20:14                     ` Richard Gooch
2001-10-28 10:06               ` Lorenzo Allegrucci
2001-11-06  5:21               ` Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  5:17             ` more devfs fun Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  5:06           ` Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  7:01         ` Poor floppy performance in kernel 2.4.10 Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  7:03           ` Alexander Viro
2001-12-09  5:38           ` Devfs races with block devices Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  7:19         ` Poor floppy performance in kernel 2.4.10 Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  7:22           ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 19:13       ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-27 19:19         ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 19:26           ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-28 20:40           ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-28 20:57             ` Peter T. Breuer [this message]
2001-10-29  5:38               ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-29  6:07                 ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-29  6:34                   ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-28 21:42             ` Alexander Viro
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-21 11:36 Alain Knaff
2001-10-22  9:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-22 10:06   ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-22 14:07 ` Nick LeRoy
2001-10-22 18:28 ` bill davidsen
2001-10-19 16:58 Manfred Spraul
2001-10-17  7:36 Kamil Iskra
2001-10-17 20:45 ` Steve Kieu
2001-10-18 10:11   ` Kamil Iskra
2001-10-18 15:28     ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-18 15:42       ` Kamil Iskra
2001-10-18 16:17         ` Ville Herva
2001-10-18 16:30           ` Nick LeRoy
2001-10-18 19:57             ` bill davidsen
2001-10-18 20:47               ` Nick LeRoy
2001-10-18 20:05             ` bill davidsen
2001-10-18 20:15               ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-18 16:18       ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-18 17:44         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-19  7:50           ` Giuliano Pochini
2001-10-19 13:46             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-19 15:57             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-20  4:20               ` Rob Landley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200110282057.f9SKvxo15573@oboe.it.uc3m.es \
    --to=ptb@it.uc3m.es \
    --cc=alain@linux.lu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®