mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dieter Nützel" <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Cc: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Subject: Re: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 04:53:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011128035317Z283011-17409+18642@vger.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011128013129Z281843-17408+21534@vger.kernel.org> <3C044855.3CF2DCA3@zip.com.au> <20011127183429.B862@mikef-linux.matchmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20011127183429.B862@mikef-linux.matchmail.com>

Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2001 03:34 schrieb Mike Fedyk:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 06:13:41PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> > > Don't forget to tune max-readahead.
> >
> > Yes.  Readahead is fairly critical and there may be additional fixes
> > needed in this area.
> >
> > Someone recently added the /proc/sys/vm/max_readahead (?) tunable.

-mt (Marcelo Tosatti) our _new_ 2.4.x maintainer did it.

> Isn't this part of the max-readahead patch?
>
> Does /proc/sys/vm/max_readahead affect scsi in any way?

Hello people, can you read?
I've reported U160 (SCSI) IBM DDYS (Ultrastar 36LZX) 18 GB 10k results...;-)

Kernel default:
SunWave1 src/linux# cat /proc/sys/vm/min-readahead
3
SunWave1 src/linux# cat /proc/sys/vm/max-readahead
31
SunWave1 src/linux# hdparm -tT /dev/sda1
/dev/sda1:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  0.80 seconds =160.00 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  2.28 seconds = 28.07 MB/sec


SunWave1 src/linux# cat /proc/sys/vm/max-readahead
127
SunWave1 src/linux# hdparm -tT /dev/sda1
/dev/sda1:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  0.80 seconds =160.00 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  1.87 seconds = 34.22 MB/sec

So it improved hdparm by 0.5 MB at the inner and 6 MB at the outer cylinders.

max-readahead=31		max-readahead=127
26-28 MB/s			26.5-34 MB/s

max-readahead=63	is nearly the same
max-readahead=255	little slower
max-readahead=511	even little slower

Here is a snipped of the IBM specs:

Performance 
Data buffer		4 MB² 
Rotational speed		10,000 RPM 
Latency (average)	2.99 ms 
Media transfer rate	280-452 Mbits/sec 
Interface transfer rate	160 MB/sec
Sustained data rate	21.7- 36.1MB/sec 

Seek time
Average			4.9 ms 
Track to track		0.5 ms 
Full track		10.5 ms 

To Robert Love:
I get the following in dmesg:
lock-break-rml-2.4.16-1.patch

date: busy buffer
lock_break: buffer.c:681: count was 2 not 551
invalidate: busy buffer
lock_break: buffer.c:681: count was 2 not 551
invalidate: busy buffer
[-]

lock-break-rml-2.4.16-2.patch

validate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
[-]

Now my dbench numbers.
First without Noatun playing Ogg-Vorbis:
dbench/dbench> time ./dbench 32
32 clients started
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................+................+..............................................................................+++.+.+.......+.....++++....++.....+++++.++++.++.+++++++********************************
Throughput 43.8254 MB/sec (NB=54.7818 MB/sec  438.254 MBit/sec)
14.490u 53.230s 1:37.40 69.5%   0+0k 0+0io 937pf+0w
system load: 23.52

Second Noatun playing Ogg-Vorbis (with hiccup):
dbench/dbench> time ./dbench 32
32 clients started
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................+....+........................+.......++++...+.+...........+.+.....+++++.+.++..++..+++.++.++++.++********************************
Throughput 42.1212 MB/sec (NB=52.6515 MB/sec  421.212 MBit/sec)
14.710u 53.940s 1:41.29 67.7%   0+0k 0+0io 937pf+0w
system load: 26.30

Not bad, I think.
Andrew, your patch follows tomorrow.

Regards,
	Dieter

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-11-28  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200111280353.fAS3rEB05638@zero.tech9.net>
2001-11-28  1:31 ` Dieter Nützel
2001-11-28  2:13   ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-28  2:34     ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-28  2:48       ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-28 20:21         ` Roger Larsson
2001-11-28  3:53       ` Dieter Nützel [this message]
2001-11-28  4:14       ` Robert Love
2001-11-28 19:42 Torrey Hoffman
2001-11-28 20:51 ` Dieter Nützel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-28 18:56 Torrey Hoffman
2001-11-28 19:31 ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-28  0:33 Torrey Hoffman
2001-11-28  0:48 ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-28 18:09   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-11-28 19:38     ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-27  9:56 willy tarreau
2001-11-27 10:57 ` Heinz Diehl
2001-11-26 22:02 Nathan G. Grennan
2001-11-26 22:17 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-26 23:34   ` Nicolas Pitre
2001-11-27  0:05     ` Steve Lion
2001-11-27  9:12     ` Ahmed Masud
2001-11-27 17:12       ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-27 20:31         ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-27 20:57           ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-27 21:19             ` Martin Eriksson
2001-11-27 21:24             ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-28 18:24             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-11-28 18:57               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-11-28 20:31               ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-28 20:56                 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-28 21:12                   ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-28 20:04                     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-11-28 21:26                       ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-26 23:59   ` Rik van Riel
2001-11-27  0:36     ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-27  0:46       ` Rik van Riel
2001-11-27  4:38       ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-27  4:45         ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-27  1:45   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-27  4:34   ` GOTO Masanori
2001-11-26 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-27  7:42   ` Jens Axboe
2001-11-27  7:58     ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-27  8:01       ` Jens Axboe
2001-11-27  8:31     ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-27  8:38       ` Jens Axboe
2001-11-26 22:44 ` Lincoln Dale
2001-11-27  0:44 ` Lost Logic
2001-11-27  0:57   ` Lost Logic
2001-11-27  3:49 ` Sean Elble
2001-11-27  3:56   ` Doug Ledford
2001-11-27  4:00     ` Sean Elble

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011128035317Z283011-17409+18642@vger.kernel.org \
    --to=dieter.nuetzel@hamburg.de \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®