* Fwd: cml2-2.1.3 bug report
@ 2002-01-16 4:06 jeff millar
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: jeff millar @ 2002-01-16 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I sent this to Eric privately with a lot of data, but maybe someone else can
jump in with an opinion about they way make oldconfig _should_ work.
Several items...
1. Make oldconfig doesn't behave like cml1. With cml1, we would patch the
kernel or copy in a backup .config file and run make oldconfig. It would do
its thing for 30 seconds and be done...no (or few) questions asked. With
CML2, I get an endless series of questions about each possible configuration
item...much like "make config" does.
I just want make oldconfig to get ready for make dep with the minimum of
fuss. It's ok to ask about new configuration items but not a bunch of stuff
already set.
2. Something triggers the building of "everything" modular, like _all_ the
network cards, I2O, IEEE1394, etc. You implied in an earlier email that
selecting modules leads to this. But, I just want to build a few modules
because it takes less time and disk space and it easier to audit
/lib/modules/2.4.x/ results. Besides with bleeding edge kernels, often lots
of drivers don't compile correctly. My original .config has m where I want it
and setting m a bunch more places means I just have to go around and shut off
hundreds of things.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-01-16 4:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-16 4:06 Fwd: cml2-2.1.3 bug report jeff millar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®