mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: 2.4.16
  2002-01-24 17:35 2.4.16 Wakko Warner
@ 2002-01-24 17:35 ` Rik van Riel
  2002-01-24 21:17 ` 2.4.16 Mr. James W. Laferriere
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 2002-01-24 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wakko Warner; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Wakko Warner wrote:

> recent 2.4 kernels seem to love eating away at memory.  After 2 weeks of
> uptime, 2.2.19 would normally consume about 120mb of ram and maybe 1mb of
> swap.  With 2.4.16 it's more than doubled.  Swap usage is 128mb, memory
> useage about 230mb.  Nothing is different between what I ran with 2.2 and
> what I run now with 2.4.

There are known issues with memory management in the main 2.4
kernel.

If you have the time, could you please try my -rmap VM or
andrea's -aa kernel ?

(available from http://surriel.com/patches/ and kernel.org
respectively)

kind regards,

Rik
-- 
"Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
    -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document

http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* 2.4.16
@ 2002-01-24 17:35 Wakko Warner
  2002-01-24 17:35 ` 2.4.16 Rik van Riel
  2002-01-24 21:17 ` 2.4.16 Mr. James W. Laferriere
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wakko Warner @ 2002-01-24 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

recent 2.4 kernels seem to love eating away at memory.  After 2 weeks of
uptime, 2.2.19 would normally consume about 120mb of ram and maybe 1mb of
swap.  With 2.4.16 it's more than doubled.  Swap usage is 128mb, memory
useage about 230mb.  Nothing is different between what I ran with 2.2 and
what I run now with 2.4.

Is linux trying to do memory consumtion like windows now?

The other odd thing is, when I go to single user (init 1), I still have
100-120mb memory used.  Only thing running is the shell init and kernel
processes.  This is after all modules have been unloaded as well (my kernel
only has what it takes to mount / and nothing more)  Where is this memory
going?  I shouldn't have THAT much used with nothing running.

memory: 512mb
swap:   130mb (2 65mb partitions on scsi)

-- 
 Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.4.16
  2002-01-24 17:35 2.4.16 Wakko Warner
  2002-01-24 17:35 ` 2.4.16 Rik van Riel
@ 2002-01-24 21:17 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mr. James W. Laferriere @ 2002-01-24 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wakko Warner; +Cc: linux-kernel


	Hello Wakko ,  I haven't seen that symptom here .  Do you want to
	trade .config's ?  Below are my stats for 11 days .  JimL

babydr@filesrv1:~$ free
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:        898260     884620      13640          0      39312     730824
-/+ buffers/cache:     114484     783776
Swap:       656532          0     656532

babydr@filesrv1:~$ uptime
  4:03pm  up 11 days, 50 min,  5 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

babydr@filesrv1:~$ uname -a
Linux filesrv1 2.4.18-pre3 #1 SMP Sun Jan 13 15:00:08 EST 2002 i686 unknown


On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Wakko Warner wrote:

> recent 2.4 kernels seem to love eating away at memory.  After 2 weeks of
> uptime, 2.2.19 would normally consume about 120mb of ram and maybe 1mb of
> swap.  With 2.4.16 it's more than doubled.  Swap usage is 128mb, memory
> useage about 230mb.  Nothing is different between what I ran with 2.2 and
> what I run now with 2.4.
>
> Is linux trying to do memory consumtion like windows now?
>
> The other odd thing is, when I go to single user (init 1), I still have
> 100-120mb memory used.  Only thing running is the shell init and kernel
> processes.  This is after all modules have been unloaded as well (my kernel
> only has what it takes to mount / and nothing more)  Where is this memory
> going?  I shouldn't have THAT much used with nothing running.
>
> memory: 512mb
> swap:   130mb (2 65mb partitions on scsi)
>
> --
>  Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

       +------------------------------------------------------------------+
       | James   W.   Laferriere | System    Techniques | Give me VMS     |
       | Network        Engineer |     P.O. Box 854     |  Give me Linux  |
       | babydr@baby-dragons.com | Coudersport PA 16915 |   only  on  AXP |
       +------------------------------------------------------------------+


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-24 21:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-24 17:35 2.4.16 Wakko Warner
2002-01-24 17:35 ` 2.4.16 Rik van Riel
2002-01-24 21:17 ` 2.4.16 Mr. James W. Laferriere

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®