mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <garzik@havoc.gtf.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	davem@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generic HDLC patch for 2.5.3
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 20:03:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020202200332.A3740@havoc.gtf.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020202190242.C1740@havoc.gtf.org> <E16XAnc-00010K-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E16XAnc-00010K-00@the-village.bc.nu>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 12:46:28AM +0000

On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 12:46:28AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > It adds undiscussed networking changed which I very much doubt DaveM
> > would approve of, and I do not approve of:  SIOCDEVICE is far too
> > generic for inclusion, and it adds a structure for passing untyped
> > data which is very definitely non-portable.
> 
> You need a very generic structure for WAN interfaces because they have
> ridiculously large numbers of configurable options. These changes were
> discussed over a year ago.
> 
> I agree with the comment about untyped data. That does want to be cleaned
> up a chunk more. 

Ok...   SIOC[GS]WANDEVICE or somesuch?

It could be made more portable and still say generic, IMHO.

	Jeff




  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-03  1:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-02 23:33 Krzysztof Halasa
2002-02-03  0:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-03  0:46   ` Alan Cox
2002-02-03  1:03     ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2002-02-03 17:13       ` Francois Romieu
2002-02-03 17:46         ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-03 22:06           ` Francois Romieu
2002-02-04 12:58             ` Krzysztof Halasa
2002-02-04 18:11               ` Francois Romieu
2002-02-05 12:11                 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2002-02-04 12:46           ` Krzysztof Halasa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020202200332.A3740@havoc.gtf.org \
    --to=garzik@havoc.gtf.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®