* Linux 2.4.17,2.5.3 process ID allocator isn't quite SMP safe.
@ 2002-02-05 20:20 Erik A. Hendriks
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Erik A. Hendriks @ 2002-02-05 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: marcelo, torvalds, linux-kernel
The get_pid function in kernel/fork.c returns the value of last_pid
after releasing the lock protecting it. On SMPs, I have observed two
processes occasionally being assigned the same process ID as a result.
I'm pretty sure the sequence of events looks like this: The first
process releases the lock after coming up with a suitable pid (stored
in last_pid). Then after it releases the lock but before it does the
return (IRQ or something happens here to create delay?) another
processor comes a long and updates it. Then get_pid returns the value
of last_pid which is now the pid chosen by the other process.
Attached below is a little patch to fix it.
- Erik
--- linux-2.4.17/kernel/fork.c.orig Mon Feb 4 14:53:31 2002
+++ linux-2.4.17/kernel/fork.c Mon Feb 4 14:53:53 2002
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@
{
static int next_safe = PID_MAX;
struct task_struct *p;
+ int pid;
if (flags & CLONE_PID)
return current->pid;
@@ -120,9 +121,10 @@
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
}
+ pid = last_pid;
spin_unlock(&lastpid_lock);
- return last_pid;
+ return pid;
}
static inline int dup_mmap(struct mm_struct * mm)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-02-05 20:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-05 20:20 Linux 2.4.17,2.5.3 process ID allocator isn't quite SMP safe Erik A. Hendriks
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®