mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul P Komkoff Jr <i@stingr.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 00:23:24 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020208002324.C423@stingr.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202052328470.32146-100000@ash.penguinppc.org> <20020207165035.GA28384@ravel.coda.cs.cmu.edu> <200202072306.PAA08272@morrowfield.home>
In-Reply-To: <200202072306.PAA08272@morrowfield.home>

Replying to Tom Lord:
> Arch will certainly need to be tuned for kernel hackers and perhaps
> customized.  Some systems are still effected by portability bugs (arch
> has been out for barely a month) Yes: because it is new, it isn't as
> "off the shelf" a solution as bk.  Nevertheless, arch is self hosting,
> rich in features, and has properties that I think are ideal for
> projects such as the kernel.  So if there is to be a shift among
> kernel developers to coordinating with a source code management tool,
> one question is whether the effort should be directed toward deploying
> bk, or towards helping to optimize arch for their use.

Today I played some interesting games with source code control systems since
I'vent got a sexual partner to play with him. But I don't satisfied with
ever :(((

First, cvs. Marcelo uses cvs :))) I using cvs in some places ... just to use
it. It lacks renaming, it lacks ... many features :(

BitKeeper ... maybe larry should consider increasing single user repository
from 1000 files to at least 12000 ? the kernel will fit well in it - I don't
wanna my experiments be published on site. It will confuse people browsing
it - believe me :)

Also bitkeeper ... I don't use X. and without damn renametool I cannot do
proper renaming :(((

aegis cruiser is a good unit in Red Alret 2, and I fear aegis. Installed it,
and just removed ...

... and finally, arch. translate it deutch-to-english, please

What I need definitely - to have several branches in scs - one for
marcelo's, one for ac, one for mjc and several for my experiments

say, marcelo release new patch -pre2 against base-0, but I already have
base-0 and patch-1 (pre1), WHAT exactly I must do to add patch-2 to marcelo
branch ?

when I derive my branch from for example patch-1 what I must do to attempt
to update my branch and (prompt to resolve merge conflicts) and then
continue working on my patch ?

And finally - I got the patch against some revision. Maybe I know it's order
(this is -pre8 it's after -pre7 but patch is against base), maybe not, maybe
unknown at all. Where is the handle to pull ?

-- 
Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff 'Greatest' Jr // (icq)23200764 // (irc)Spacebar
  PPKJ1-RIPE // (smtp)i@stingr.net // (http)stingr.net // (pgp)0xA4B4ECA4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-02-07 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-06  7:33 Jeramy B. Smith
2002-02-06 15:15 ` Florian Weimer
2002-02-07 16:50 ` Jan Harkes
2002-02-07 23:06 ` Tom Lord
2002-02-07 21:23   ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-07 21:23   ` Paul P Komkoff Jr [this message]
2002-02-07 21:28     ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-07 21:25   ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-08 15:33     ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-08 21:35       ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-11  8:20     ` Josh MacDonald
2002-02-11 15:00       ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-11 20:25         ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-11 22:14         ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-12  5:17         ` Tom Lord
2002-02-12  3:59           ` Theodore Tso
2002-02-12  6:19             ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-02-12 20:28           ` Tom Lord
2002-02-12 22:54             ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-13  0:52               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-13 10:35               ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-13  9:41             ` Tom Lord
2002-02-12 11:01         ` Josh MacDonald
2002-02-12 11:15           ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-18 18:10           ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-03-10  8:36     ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-10 19:41       ` Itai Nahshon
2002-03-10 20:19         ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-10 21:16           ` Rob Turk
2002-03-10 21:34             ` Alan Cox
2002-03-10 21:23               ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-11  8:22                 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-10 21:28               ` Alexander Viro
2002-03-11 11:04                 ` Mark H. Wood
2002-03-11  9:46               ` Harald Arnesen
2002-03-11 14:05           ` Luigi Genoni
2002-03-10 21:37         ` Richard Gooch
2002-03-11  5:48           ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-11  5:52             ` Alexander Viro
2002-03-11  6:15               ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-11  6:37                 ` Alexander Viro
2002-03-11 13:13                 ` yodaiken
2002-03-11 15:51                   ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-11 16:08                     ` yodaiken
2002-03-11 16:56                       ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-11 22:51                 ` James Antill
2002-03-12  7:58                   ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-12 22:37                     ` Andrew Pimlott
2002-03-13  8:09                       ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-13 15:10                         ` Andrew Pimlott
2002-03-13  9:39                       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-03-13 14:37                         ` Andrew Pimlott
2002-03-13 16:26                           ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-13 16:30                             ` Andrew Pimlott
2002-03-13 19:18                               ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-14  9:39                               ` filesystem transactions (was Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing) Tom Lord
2002-03-14  8:26                                 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-14 10:31                                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-03-11  6:42               ` linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing Richard Gooch
2002-03-11 10:46         ` Mark H. Wood
2002-03-11 11:32           ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-11 15:29             ` Steven Cole
2002-03-11 16:08               ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-11 16:25                 ` Steven Cole
2002-03-11 17:08                   ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-11 17:16                   ` Nikita Danilov
2002-03-11 18:22                   ` VMS File versions (was RE: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing) Robert Pfister
2002-03-11 18:41                   ` linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing Steven Cole
2002-03-11 19:15                     ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-11 21:33                       ` Steven Cole
2002-03-11 21:54                         ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-03-11 22:01                           ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-03-11 22:19                           ` Steven Cole
2002-03-12  0:14                             ` Robert Pfister
2002-03-12  7:54                         ` linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing (If you don't like the closed source nature of Bitkeeper, stop your whining and help out with reiserfs.) Hans Reiser
2002-03-12  1:28                     ` linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing Mark H. Wood
2002-02-08  1:02   ` Tom Lord
2002-02-08  2:32   ` Tom Lord
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-12 18:08 Thunder from the hill
2002-02-06  3:37 Linus Torvalds
2002-02-06  6:50 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-06  7:50 ` Reid Hekman
2002-02-06  8:03   ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-06 19:35     ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-02-06 19:45       ` Tom Rini
2002-02-06 20:35       ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-06 22:25         ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-06 20:44       ` Wayne Scott
2002-02-06 15:17 ` Florian Weimer
2002-02-06 15:32   ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-06 16:54   ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-06 22:19   ` Rob Landley
2002-02-06 17:30 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-06 17:33   ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-06 19:58     ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-06 23:36       ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-06 23:54         ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-07  8:07         ` Stelian Pop
2002-02-07 16:36           ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-07 17:26             ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-07 19:46               ` Stelian Pop
2002-02-08  0:29                 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-08  5:28               ` Troy Benjegerdes
2002-02-08  6:06                 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-08  6:14                   ` Troy Benjegerdes
2002-02-08  6:49                   ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-07 10:50         ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-06 19:38 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-06 23:06   ` Larry McVoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020208002324.C423@stingr.net \
    --to=i@stingr.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome