mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH] per-cpu areas
       [not found] <E17wsrr-0007bD-00@wagner.rustcorp.com.au>
@ 2002-02-12  4:58 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
  2002-02-13  9:48   ` Rusty Russell
  2002-02-19  2:05 ` Something Wrong with LKML ???? Zoran Davidovac
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai @ 2002-02-12  4:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: linux-kernel

> +static void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long size, i;
> +	char *ptr;
> +	/* Created by linker magic */
> +	extern char __per_cpu_start[], __per_cpu_end[];
> +
> +	/* Copy section for each CPU (we discard the original) */
> +	size = ALIGN(__per_cpu_end - __per_cpu_start, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> +	ptr = alloc_bootmem(size * NR_CPUS);

Would it be possible to free up NR_CPUS - smp_num_cpus worth of memory 
after smp_init? .... 

Regards,
Kiran

-- 
Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@in.ibm.com>
Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Labs,
Bangalore.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] per-cpu areas
  2002-02-12  4:58 ` [PATCH] per-cpu areas Ravikiran G Thirumalai
@ 2002-02-13  9:48   ` Rusty Russell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2002-02-13  9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai; +Cc: linux-kernel

In message <20020212102852.I32236@in.ibm.com> you write:
> > +static void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long size, i;
> > +	char *ptr;
> > +	/* Created by linker magic */
> > +	extern char __per_cpu_start[], __per_cpu_end[];
> > +
> > +	/* Copy section for each CPU (we discard the original) */
> > +	size = ALIGN(__per_cpu_end - __per_cpu_start, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > +	ptr = alloc_bootmem(size * NR_CPUS);
> 
> Would it be possible to free up NR_CPUS - smp_num_cpus worth of memory 
> after smp_init? .... 

Yes, but memory is cheap, and writing a special "partial free"
function for this is icky.  Maybe in 2 years when the per-cpu area is
100MB. 8)

We're better off reducing NR_CPUs to the maxmimum possible value of
smp_num_cpus() on that machine, IMHO.

Rusty.
--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Something Wrong with LKML ????
       [not found] <E17wsrr-0007bD-00@wagner.rustcorp.com.au>
  2002-02-12  4:58 ` [PATCH] per-cpu areas Ravikiran G Thirumalai
@ 2002-02-19  2:05 ` Zoran Davidovac
  2002-02-19  8:19   ` Matti Aarnio
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zoran Davidovac @ 2002-02-19  2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

>From Feb 13 09:23:09 until now Tue Feb 19 03:00:08 CET 2002 
I did not get any mail from relay=vger.kernel.org [12.107.208.194]

something wrong ?

or am I unsubscribed of this list because
my mail box was off for few hours 
during upgrade ?

please CC on mail I not sure I am on list.

Thank You,

	Zoran

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Something Wrong with LKML ????
  2002-02-19  2:05 ` Something Wrong with LKML ???? Zoran Davidovac
@ 2002-02-19  8:19   ` Matti Aarnio
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Matti Aarnio @ 2002-02-19  8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zoran Davidovac; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:05:48AM +0100, Zoran Davidovac wrote:
> Date:	Tue, 19 Feb 2002 03:05:48 +0100
> From:	Zoran Davidovac <zdavid@unicef.org.yu>
> To:	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Something Wrong with LKML ????
> 
> >From Feb 13 09:23:09 until now Tue Feb 19 03:00:08 CET 2002 
> I did not get any mail from relay=vger.kernel.org [12.107.208.194]
> 
> something wrong ?
> or am I unsubscribed of this list because
> my mail box was off for few hours 
> during upgrade ?

   Yes, sort of.   We got a large bunch of "relaying denied"
   bounces from your domain's backup MX server.

   Use the tool:   http://vger.kernel.org/mxverify.html
   to see, how your email setup appears to the email senders.

> please CC on mail I not sure I am on list.
> Thank You,
> 	Zoran

/Matti Aarnio

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] per-cpu areas
@ 2002-03-05  7:54 Rusty Russell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2002-03-05  7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: torvalds; +Cc: linux-kernel

Linus, please apply (retransmit, neatened a little).

Thanks,
Rusty.

diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.3/include/linux/smp.h working-2.5.3-percpu/include/linux/smp.h
--- linux-2.5.3/include/linux/smp.h	Fri Feb  1 19:21:37 2002
+++ working-2.5.3-percpu/include/linux/smp.h	Fri Feb  1 19:17:09 2002
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
 #include <asm/smp.h>
 
 /*
@@ -71,7 +72,17 @@
 #define MSG_RESCHEDULE		0x0003	/* Reschedule request from master CPU*/
 #define MSG_CALL_FUNCTION       0x0004  /* Call function on all other CPUs */
 
-#else
+#define __per_cpu_data	__attribute__((section(".data.percpu")))
+
+#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PER_CPU
+extern unsigned long __per_cpu_offset[NR_CPUS];
+
+/* var is in discarded region: offset to particular copy we want */
+#define per_cpu(var, cpu) RELOC_HIDE(var, per_cpu_offset(cpu))
+
+#define this_cpu(var) per_cpu(var, smp_processor_id())
+#endif /* !__HAVE_ARCH_PER_CPU */
+#else /* !SMP */
 
 /*
  *	These macros fold the SMP functionality into a single CPU system
@@ -88,6 +99,9 @@
 #define cpu_online_map				1
 static inline void smp_send_reschedule(int cpu) { }
 static inline void smp_send_reschedule_all(void) { }
+#define __per_cpu_data
+#define per_cpu(var, cpu)			var
+#define this_cpu(var)				var
 
 #endif
 #endif
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.3/init/main.c working-2.5.3-percpu/init/main.c
--- linux-2.5.3/init/main.c	Thu Jan 31 08:59:17 2002
+++ working-2.5.3-percpu/init/main.c	Fri Feb  1 19:13:52 2002
@@ -272,8 +272,32 @@
 #define smp_init()	do { } while (0)
 #endif
 
+static inline void setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
+{
+}
 #else
 
+#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PER_CPU
+unsigned long __per_cpu_offset[NR_CPUS];
+
+static void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
+{
+	unsigned long size, i;
+	char *ptr;
+	/* Created by linker magic */
+	extern char __per_cpu_start[], __per_cpu_end[];
+
+	/* Copy section for each CPU (we discard the original) */
+	size = ALIGN(__per_cpu_end - __per_cpu_start, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
+	ptr = alloc_bootmem(size * NR_CPUS);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++, ptr += size) {
+		__per_cpu_offset[i] = ptr - __per_cpu_start;
+		memcpy(ptr, __per_cpu_start, size);
+	}
+}
+#endif /* !__HAVE_ARCH_PER_CPU */
+
 /* Called by boot processor to activate the rest. */
 static void __init smp_init(void)
 {
@@ -316,6 +340,7 @@
 	lock_kernel();
 	printk(linux_banner);
 	setup_arch(&command_line);
+	setup_per_cpu_areas();
 	printk("Kernel command line: %s\n", saved_command_line);
 	parse_options(command_line);
 	trap_init();
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.3/include/linux/compiler.h working-2.5.3-percpu/include/linux/compiler.h
--- linux-2.5.3/include/linux/compiler.h	Wed Sep 19 07:12:45 2001
+++ working-2.5.3-percpu/include/linux/compiler.h	Fri Feb  1 09:46:02 2002
@@ -13,4 +13,11 @@
 #define likely(x)	__builtin_expect((x),1)
 #define unlikely(x)	__builtin_expect((x),0)
 
+/* This macro obfuscates arithmetic on a variable address so that gcc
+   shouldn't recognize the original var, and make assumptions about it */
+	strcpy(s, "xxx"+X) => memcpy(s, "xxx"+X, 4-X) */
+#define RELOC_HIDE(var, off)						\
+  ({ __typeof__(&(var)) __ptr;					\
+    __asm__ ("" : "=g"(__ptr) : "0"((void *)&(var) + (off)));	\
+    *__ptr; })
 #endif /* __LINUX_COMPILER_H */
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.3/include/linux/cache.h working-2.5.3-percpu/include/linux/cache.h
--- linux-2.5.3/include/linux/cache.h	Fri Feb  1 19:21:37 2002
+++ working-2.5.3-percpu/include/linux/cache.h	Fri Feb  1 19:17:09 2002
@@ -4,8 +4,10 @@
 #include <linux/config.h>
 #include <asm/cache.h>
 
+#define ALIGN(x,a) (((x)+(a)-1)&~((a)-1))
+
 #ifndef L1_CACHE_ALIGN
-#define L1_CACHE_ALIGN(x) (((x)+(L1_CACHE_BYTES-1))&~(L1_CACHE_BYTES-1))
+#define L1_CACHE_ALIGN(x) ALIGN(x, L1_CACHE_BYTES)
 #endif
 
 #ifndef SMP_CACHE_BYTES
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.3/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds working-2.5.3-percpu/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds
--- linux-2.5.3/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds	Thu Jan 31 08:58:52 2002
+++ working-2.5.3-percpu/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds	Fri Feb  1 09:11:18 2002
@@ -58,6 +58,10 @@
 	*(.initcall7.init)
   }
   __initcall_end = .;
+  . = ALIGN(32);
+  __per_cpu_start = .;
+  .data.percpu  : { *(.data.percpu) }
+  __per_cpu_end = .;
   . = ALIGN(4096);
   __init_end = .;
 
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.3/arch/ppc/vmlinux.lds working-2.5.3-percpu/arch/ppc/vmlinux.lds
--- linux-2.5.3/arch/ppc/vmlinux.lds	Thu Jan 31 08:58:55 2002
+++ working-2.5.3-percpu/arch/ppc/vmlinux.lds	Fri Feb  1 09:11:18 2002
@@ -104,6 +104,10 @@
 	*(.initcall7.init)
   }
   __initcall_end = .;
+  . = ALIGN(32);
+  __per_cpu_start = .;
+  .data.percpu  : { *(.data.percpu) }
+  __per_cpu_end = .;
   . = ALIGN(4096);
   __init_end = .;
 

--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-03-05  7:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <E17wsrr-0007bD-00@wagner.rustcorp.com.au>
2002-02-12  4:58 ` [PATCH] per-cpu areas Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2002-02-13  9:48   ` Rusty Russell
2002-02-19  2:05 ` Something Wrong with LKML ???? Zoran Davidovac
2002-02-19  8:19   ` Matti Aarnio
2002-03-05  7:54 [PATCH] per-cpu areas Rusty Russell

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®