* Re: [PATCH] per-cpu areas
[not found] <E17wsrr-0007bD-00@wagner.rustcorp.com.au>
@ 2002-02-12 4:58 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2002-02-13 9:48 ` Rusty Russell
2002-02-19 2:05 ` Something Wrong with LKML ???? Zoran Davidovac
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai @ 2002-02-12 4:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: linux-kernel
> +static void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long size, i;
> + char *ptr;
> + /* Created by linker magic */
> + extern char __per_cpu_start[], __per_cpu_end[];
> +
> + /* Copy section for each CPU (we discard the original) */
> + size = ALIGN(__per_cpu_end - __per_cpu_start, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> + ptr = alloc_bootmem(size * NR_CPUS);
Would it be possible to free up NR_CPUS - smp_num_cpus worth of memory
after smp_init? ....
Regards,
Kiran
--
Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@in.ibm.com>
Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Labs,
Bangalore.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] per-cpu areas
2002-02-12 4:58 ` [PATCH] per-cpu areas Ravikiran G Thirumalai
@ 2002-02-13 9:48 ` Rusty Russell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2002-02-13 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai; +Cc: linux-kernel
In message <20020212102852.I32236@in.ibm.com> you write:
> > +static void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long size, i;
> > + char *ptr;
> > + /* Created by linker magic */
> > + extern char __per_cpu_start[], __per_cpu_end[];
> > +
> > + /* Copy section for each CPU (we discard the original) */
> > + size = ALIGN(__per_cpu_end - __per_cpu_start, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > + ptr = alloc_bootmem(size * NR_CPUS);
>
> Would it be possible to free up NR_CPUS - smp_num_cpus worth of memory
> after smp_init? ....
Yes, but memory is cheap, and writing a special "partial free"
function for this is icky. Maybe in 2 years when the per-cpu area is
100MB. 8)
We're better off reducing NR_CPUs to the maxmimum possible value of
smp_num_cpus() on that machine, IMHO.
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Something Wrong with LKML ????
[not found] <E17wsrr-0007bD-00@wagner.rustcorp.com.au>
2002-02-12 4:58 ` [PATCH] per-cpu areas Ravikiran G Thirumalai
@ 2002-02-19 2:05 ` Zoran Davidovac
2002-02-19 8:19 ` Matti Aarnio
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zoran Davidovac @ 2002-02-19 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
>From Feb 13 09:23:09 until now Tue Feb 19 03:00:08 CET 2002
I did not get any mail from relay=vger.kernel.org [12.107.208.194]
something wrong ?
or am I unsubscribed of this list because
my mail box was off for few hours
during upgrade ?
please CC on mail I not sure I am on list.
Thank You,
Zoran
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Something Wrong with LKML ????
2002-02-19 2:05 ` Something Wrong with LKML ???? Zoran Davidovac
@ 2002-02-19 8:19 ` Matti Aarnio
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Matti Aarnio @ 2002-02-19 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zoran Davidovac; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:05:48AM +0100, Zoran Davidovac wrote:
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 03:05:48 +0100
> From: Zoran Davidovac <zdavid@unicef.org.yu>
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Something Wrong with LKML ????
>
> >From Feb 13 09:23:09 until now Tue Feb 19 03:00:08 CET 2002
> I did not get any mail from relay=vger.kernel.org [12.107.208.194]
>
> something wrong ?
> or am I unsubscribed of this list because
> my mail box was off for few hours
> during upgrade ?
Yes, sort of. We got a large bunch of "relaying denied"
bounces from your domain's backup MX server.
Use the tool: http://vger.kernel.org/mxverify.html
to see, how your email setup appears to the email senders.
> please CC on mail I not sure I am on list.
> Thank You,
> Zoran
/Matti Aarnio
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] per-cpu areas
@ 2002-03-05 7:54 Rusty Russell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2002-03-05 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: torvalds; +Cc: linux-kernel
Linus, please apply (retransmit, neatened a little).
Thanks,
Rusty.
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.3/include/linux/smp.h working-2.5.3-percpu/include/linux/smp.h
--- linux-2.5.3/include/linux/smp.h Fri Feb 1 19:21:37 2002
+++ working-2.5.3-percpu/include/linux/smp.h Fri Feb 1 19:17:09 2002
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
#include <asm/smp.h>
/*
@@ -71,7 +72,17 @@
#define MSG_RESCHEDULE 0x0003 /* Reschedule request from master CPU*/
#define MSG_CALL_FUNCTION 0x0004 /* Call function on all other CPUs */
-#else
+#define __per_cpu_data __attribute__((section(".data.percpu")))
+
+#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PER_CPU
+extern unsigned long __per_cpu_offset[NR_CPUS];
+
+/* var is in discarded region: offset to particular copy we want */
+#define per_cpu(var, cpu) RELOC_HIDE(var, per_cpu_offset(cpu))
+
+#define this_cpu(var) per_cpu(var, smp_processor_id())
+#endif /* !__HAVE_ARCH_PER_CPU */
+#else /* !SMP */
/*
* These macros fold the SMP functionality into a single CPU system
@@ -88,6 +99,9 @@
#define cpu_online_map 1
static inline void smp_send_reschedule(int cpu) { }
static inline void smp_send_reschedule_all(void) { }
+#define __per_cpu_data
+#define per_cpu(var, cpu) var
+#define this_cpu(var) var
#endif
#endif
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.3/init/main.c working-2.5.3-percpu/init/main.c
--- linux-2.5.3/init/main.c Thu Jan 31 08:59:17 2002
+++ working-2.5.3-percpu/init/main.c Fri Feb 1 19:13:52 2002
@@ -272,8 +272,32 @@
#define smp_init() do { } while (0)
#endif
+static inline void setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
+{
+}
#else
+#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PER_CPU
+unsigned long __per_cpu_offset[NR_CPUS];
+
+static void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
+{
+ unsigned long size, i;
+ char *ptr;
+ /* Created by linker magic */
+ extern char __per_cpu_start[], __per_cpu_end[];
+
+ /* Copy section for each CPU (we discard the original) */
+ size = ALIGN(__per_cpu_end - __per_cpu_start, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
+ ptr = alloc_bootmem(size * NR_CPUS);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++, ptr += size) {
+ __per_cpu_offset[i] = ptr - __per_cpu_start;
+ memcpy(ptr, __per_cpu_start, size);
+ }
+}
+#endif /* !__HAVE_ARCH_PER_CPU */
+
/* Called by boot processor to activate the rest. */
static void __init smp_init(void)
{
@@ -316,6 +340,7 @@
lock_kernel();
printk(linux_banner);
setup_arch(&command_line);
+ setup_per_cpu_areas();
printk("Kernel command line: %s\n", saved_command_line);
parse_options(command_line);
trap_init();
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.3/include/linux/compiler.h working-2.5.3-percpu/include/linux/compiler.h
--- linux-2.5.3/include/linux/compiler.h Wed Sep 19 07:12:45 2001
+++ working-2.5.3-percpu/include/linux/compiler.h Fri Feb 1 09:46:02 2002
@@ -13,4 +13,11 @@
#define likely(x) __builtin_expect((x),1)
#define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect((x),0)
+/* This macro obfuscates arithmetic on a variable address so that gcc
+ shouldn't recognize the original var, and make assumptions about it */
+ strcpy(s, "xxx"+X) => memcpy(s, "xxx"+X, 4-X) */
+#define RELOC_HIDE(var, off) \
+ ({ __typeof__(&(var)) __ptr; \
+ __asm__ ("" : "=g"(__ptr) : "0"((void *)&(var) + (off))); \
+ *__ptr; })
#endif /* __LINUX_COMPILER_H */
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.3/include/linux/cache.h working-2.5.3-percpu/include/linux/cache.h
--- linux-2.5.3/include/linux/cache.h Fri Feb 1 19:21:37 2002
+++ working-2.5.3-percpu/include/linux/cache.h Fri Feb 1 19:17:09 2002
@@ -4,8 +4,10 @@
#include <linux/config.h>
#include <asm/cache.h>
+#define ALIGN(x,a) (((x)+(a)-1)&~((a)-1))
+
#ifndef L1_CACHE_ALIGN
-#define L1_CACHE_ALIGN(x) (((x)+(L1_CACHE_BYTES-1))&~(L1_CACHE_BYTES-1))
+#define L1_CACHE_ALIGN(x) ALIGN(x, L1_CACHE_BYTES)
#endif
#ifndef SMP_CACHE_BYTES
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.3/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds working-2.5.3-percpu/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds
--- linux-2.5.3/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds Thu Jan 31 08:58:52 2002
+++ working-2.5.3-percpu/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds Fri Feb 1 09:11:18 2002
@@ -58,6 +58,10 @@
*(.initcall7.init)
}
__initcall_end = .;
+ . = ALIGN(32);
+ __per_cpu_start = .;
+ .data.percpu : { *(.data.percpu) }
+ __per_cpu_end = .;
. = ALIGN(4096);
__init_end = .;
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.3/arch/ppc/vmlinux.lds working-2.5.3-percpu/arch/ppc/vmlinux.lds
--- linux-2.5.3/arch/ppc/vmlinux.lds Thu Jan 31 08:58:55 2002
+++ working-2.5.3-percpu/arch/ppc/vmlinux.lds Fri Feb 1 09:11:18 2002
@@ -104,6 +104,10 @@
*(.initcall7.init)
}
__initcall_end = .;
+ . = ALIGN(32);
+ __per_cpu_start = .;
+ .data.percpu : { *(.data.percpu) }
+ __per_cpu_end = .;
. = ALIGN(4096);
__init_end = .;
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-03-05 7:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <E17wsrr-0007bD-00@wagner.rustcorp.com.au>
2002-02-12 4:58 ` [PATCH] per-cpu areas Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2002-02-13 9:48 ` Rusty Russell
2002-02-19 2:05 ` Something Wrong with LKML ???? Zoran Davidovac
2002-02-19 8:19 ` Matti Aarnio
2002-03-05 7:54 [PATCH] per-cpu areas Rusty Russell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®