* What? Clock Slowdown Again?
@ 2002-02-16 8:51 Eric Gillespie
2002-02-16 21:44 ` Francois Romieu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Gillespie @ 2002-02-16 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
==== Problem One ====
Hi all. I started noticing the "clock slowdown" problem when I started with
2.4.x series of kernels, and described it in a past post. In summary, under
framebuffer mode, when the interrupts are disabled, they don't get re-enabled
quickly enough to make sure the system clock keeps up. I was told about a
patch that would help to solve this, I applied said patch (2.4.3) then, when
the kernel updated to 2.4.11, I was pleased to see the Andrew Morton patch
integrated into the kernel.
However, I'm noticing the slowdown again, though not to the same extent. I
took the kernel up to 2.4.17 but I need to do some further tests to see what
else I can ferret out.
==== Problem Two ====
Also, what are the plans for replacing the virt_to_bus / bus_to_virt
functions? The sourcecode basically says to use pci_map functions, but, being
almost a kernel illiterate (I know how to compile, apply patches, and not much
else) I don't know how to get started on converting. I thought that
pci_resource_{start,end,len} may also be needed too. Am I right?
Again, thanks for all your time. I read KT and found out about why my 2.5.4
kernel refused to compile, fixed that, fixed another couple of things, then
came up against this bus_to_virt problem, which I'd like to get fixed before I
go anywhere with 2.5 - understandable as I just aout live for my 160x64 text
screen 8-) I use a VESA framebuffer, as the SiS framebuffer code hasn't been
extended to include the 5597/5598 yet.
Must go...now I can FINALLY send this off, six months after originally
composeng it.
Regards, The Viking
(Please, email me as well, the list takes a VERY long time to read, and I
might miss your post...)
--
/| _,.:*^*:., |\ Cheers from the Viking family,
| |_/' viking@ `\_| | including Pippin, our cat
| flying-brick | $FunnyMail Bilbo : Now far ahead the Road has gone,
\_.caverock.net.nz_/ 5.39 in LOTR : Let others follow it who can!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: What? Clock Slowdown Again?
2002-02-16 8:51 What? Clock Slowdown Again? Eric Gillespie
@ 2002-02-16 21:44 ` Francois Romieu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Francois Romieu @ 2002-02-16 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Gillespie; +Cc: linux-kernel
Eric Gillespie <viking@flying-brick.caverock.net.nz> :
[...]
> Also, what are the plans for replacing the virt_to_bus / bus_to_virt
> functions? The sourcecode basically says to use pci_map functions, but, being
> almost a kernel illiterate (I know how to compile, apply patches, and not much
> else) I don't know how to get started on converting. I thought that
> pci_resource_{start,end,len} may also be needed too. Am I right?
Look at Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt, section "Types of DMA mappings"
Read it again from the start. If you aren't familiar with PCI,
http://ww.google.com/search?hl=en&q=PCI+dual+address+cycle+explanation may
help. Then look at drivers/net/{epic/eepro100/3c59x}.c and grep for the
functions quoted in DMA-mapping.txt. After that, glue all the pieces in
your head.
--
Ueimor
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-16 21:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-16 8:51 What? Clock Slowdown Again? Eric Gillespie
2002-02-16 21:44 ` Francois Romieu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®