From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@fenrus.demon.nl>
To: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Submitting PROMISE IDE Controllers Driver Patch
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 08:50:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020308085028.A14375@fenrus.demon.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200203080823.g288NC514338@fenrus.demon.nl> <3C8877D7.2020708@evision-ventures.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C8877D7.2020708@evision-ventures.com>; from dalecki@evision-ventures.com on Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 09:35:35AM +0100
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 09:35:35AM +0100, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> Please look closer at my posting. I just think, that since there
> are apparently no tru hardware raid devices out there it would
> be sufficient to expand the detection code to not ignore
> RAID class devices at all. This would just prevent
> us from having two different entries in the
> device detection list. Not much more involved I think.
There's one tiny glitch: there are exactly 2 "real" raid devices out there
(that I know of at least). But anyway, a "don't look at" list will be
MUCH shorter than a "look also at" list.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-08 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-07 9:01 Hank Yang
2002-03-07 10:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-03-08 1:45 ` Hank Yang
2002-03-08 2:10 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-08 3:01 ` Hank Yang
2002-03-08 8:19 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-08 8:23 ` arjan
2002-03-08 8:35 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-08 8:50 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2002-03-08 9:14 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-08 13:12 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-08 19:25 ` Kelsey Hudson
2002-03-09 13:25 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-08 13:25 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-13 7:35 ` Hank Yang
2002-03-13 7:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-03-08 2:54 ` Kelsey Hudson
2002-03-08 7:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-03-08 8:12 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-07 13:15 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-08 3:49 ` Hank Yang
2002-03-08 13:14 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-13 6:52 ` Hank Yang
2002-03-13 16:39 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 9:38 ` Hank Yang
[not found] ` <039701c20892$3940ca30$c0cca8c0@promise.com.tw>
2002-05-31 14:33 ` [PATCH] Submitting PROMISE IDE " Alan Cox
2002-06-03 3:51 ` [PATCH] 2.4.19pre9 in pdc202xx.c bug Hank Yang
2002-06-03 15:48 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-06 2:31 ` Hank Yang
2002-06-06 12:17 ` Alan Cox
[not found] ` <3C876199.5000107@evision-ventures.com>
2002-03-08 2:00 ` [PATCH] Submitting PROMISE IDE Controllers Driver Patch Hank Yang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-10 14:23 Ed Tomlinson
2002-03-10 14:47 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-11 9:56 ` benh
[not found] <200203071331.g27DVi211087@sunrise.pg.gda.pl>
2002-03-07 13:36 ` Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
2002-03-07 6:46 Hank Yang
2002-03-09 21:23 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020308085028.A14375@fenrus.demon.nl \
--to=arjan@fenrus.demon.nl \
--cc=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®