From: Itai Nahshon <nahshon@actcom.co.il>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca (Richard Gooch)
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox),
bcrl@redhat.com (Benjamin LaHaise),
akpm@zip.com.au (Andrew Morton),
joeja@mindspring.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: faster boots?
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 02:02:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200204052302.g35N2o516910@lmail.actcom.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16tTAF-0008F2-00@the-village.bc.nu>
On Friday 05 April 2002 15:49 pm, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Be careful here. I did this for a while with a Maxtor 80 GB IDE drive,
> > and after a few months, it started making unpleasant noises when
> > spinning up (lots of clicking and clacking). I went back to continuous
>
> I can tell you I've had 80Gb Maxtors do that that were always spun up. They
> went back and the replacement ones have behaved so far. I don't think its
> that related
>
That should all on a per-disk configuration. I would like a different,
configurable spin-down timeout (optionally never) for each disk.
A required feature IMHO: there should _never_ be dirty blocks
for disks that are not spinning.
Maybe it is possible to internally remount RO file systems that
have data on the disk before spinning down. Should not be much
of a problem if the file system is mounted with noatime and there
aren't any files open for writing nor directory operations in progress.
I'd rather have open() blocking and not fill all the memory with
dirty buffers that need to wait for spin-up to complete before they
can be written.
Swap areas, direct access to block device. loop devices and
raid partitions may be more difficult but you get the idea...
-- Itai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-05 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-04 23:54 joeja
2002-04-05 0:21 ` Alan Cox
2002-04-05 1:00 ` Jeremy Jackson
2002-04-05 0:26 ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-05 2:18 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-05 2:51 ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-05 3:00 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-04-05 3:21 ` Alan Cox
2002-04-05 5:38 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-05 12:49 ` Alan Cox
2002-04-05 16:33 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-05 23:02 ` Itai Nahshon [this message]
2002-04-05 23:07 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-04-06 0:07 ` Itai Nahshon
2002-04-06 0:29 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-04-07 14:42 ` Pavel Machek
2002-04-08 0:48 ` Itai Nahshon
2002-04-08 0:57 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-08 1:14 ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-08 4:17 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-04-08 9:57 ` Pavel Machek
2002-04-08 16:43 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-04-08 16:48 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-04-08 21:09 ` Pavel Machek
2002-04-09 0:56 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-04-09 22:22 ` Pavel Machek
2002-04-12 10:44 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-04-12 11:42 ` Pavel Machek
2002-04-12 14:29 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-04-14 19:40 ` Pavel Machek
2002-04-15 13:34 ` Philipp Matthias Hahn
2002-04-08 17:08 ` Mark Mielke
2002-04-08 17:49 ` Rene Rebe
2002-04-08 18:02 ` G . Sumner Hayes
2002-04-08 6:02 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-04-08 17:06 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-08 16:13 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-08 15:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-08 17:32 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-08 18:31 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-08 18:40 ` David Lang
2002-04-08 18:56 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-04-08 19:06 ` David Lang
2002-04-08 19:27 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-04-08 8:03 ` Helge Hafting
2002-04-08 12:38 ` Rogier Wolff
2002-04-08 14:41 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-08 9:55 ` Pavel Machek
2002-04-08 12:15 ` Rogier Wolff
2002-04-08 12:09 ` Rogier Wolff
2002-04-05 6:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-04-05 12:45 ` Alan Cox
2002-04-05 13:04 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-05 21:33 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-04-05 5:26 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-05 7:45 ` dean gaudet
2002-04-05 18:43 ` Jeremy Jackson
2002-04-05 0:44 ` Piotr Esden-Tempski
2002-04-05 13:37 ` Mauricio Nuñez
2002-04-05 1:11 ` Ross Vandegrift
2002-04-05 1:55 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-04-05 12:56 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-10 1:20 ` Mike Touloumtzis
2002-04-05 19:08 ` Mark H. Wood
2002-04-05 2:10 joeja
2002-04-05 7:44 ` Helge Hafting
2002-04-05 12:13 ` Thomas 'Dent' Mirlacher
2002-04-05 15:14 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-04-05 8:00 willy tarreau
2002-04-05 13:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-05 13:21 ` willy tarreau
2002-04-05 15:29 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-05 16:20 ` willy tarreau
2002-04-05 23:10 ` Itai Nahshon
[not found] <3CACEF18.CE742314@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204042330270.10358-100000@twinlark.arctic.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-04-05 8:41 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-05 18:23 Torrey Hoffman
2002-04-06 17:53 Re: " Alan Cox
2002-04-06 19:01 ` Joe
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204051403200.7124-100000@mhw.ULib.IUPUI.Edu >
2002-04-07 20:10 ` Stevie O
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200204052302.g35N2o516910@lmail.actcom.co.il \
--to=nahshon@actcom.co.il \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=joeja@mindspring.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®