mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: Andy Carlson <naclos@andyc.dyndns.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?)
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 09:35:44 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020506233544.GA21495@krispykreme> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205061608300.26867-100000@mustard.heime.net> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205061106050.2878-100000@ancyc>

 
> Do the userspace tools still depend on Redhat or a derivative?  If this 
> is true, I would say that Tux should stay out of the kernel.  It is 
> aggravating when you want to try something new, and run into 
> dependencies on specific distros.

No, I use tux on a ppc64 debian machine. It took 30 seconds of adapting the
tux rc file.

Anton

  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-06 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-06  0:28 khttpd rotten? Dan Kegel
2002-05-06  2:14 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-06  2:39   ` Dan Kegel
2002-05-06 10:23     ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-05-06 11:28       ` [PATCH] " Dan Kegel
2002-05-06 17:23       ` Luigi Genoni
2002-05-09  9:49       ` David S. Miller
2002-05-09 10:09         ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-05-09 13:04           ` Luigi Genoni
2002-05-11  0:13             ` Ken Brownfield
2002-05-06 14:17     ` Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?) Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-05-06 16:08       ` Andy Carlson
2002-05-06 23:35         ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2002-05-07 14:42         ` Alan Cox
2002-05-07 15:03           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-07 15:26             ` Alan Cox
2002-05-07 15:38               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-07 16:02             ` Luigi Genoni
2002-05-06 17:21       ` Dan Kegel
2002-05-06 18:42       ` John Stoffel
2002-05-06 19:07         ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-06 19:18           ` Cort Dougan
2002-05-06 20:47         ` Michael Rothwell
2002-05-09 11:20           ` Appications in kernelspace (was:Tux in main kernel tree?) Anders Peter Fugmann
2002-05-06 21:52         ` Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?) Paul Jakma
2002-05-09 11:28           ` john slee
2002-05-07  3:00         ` J Sloan
2002-05-09 11:40   ` khttpd rotten? john slee
2002-05-09 11:29     ` David S. Miller
2002-05-09 19:30       ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-09 19:35         ` David S. Miller
2002-05-09 19:39           ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-10 10:20         ` Andi Kleen
2002-05-10 10:49           ` David S. Miller
2002-05-09 20:12     ` Ian Molton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020506233544.GA21495@krispykreme \
    --to=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naclos@andyc.dyndns.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®