* WRT SIGURG incorrectly delivered to process
@ 2002-05-08 20:39 David Weinehall
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: David Weinehall @ 2002-05-08 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux-Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Linus Torvalds, marcello, cyeoh, anton, paulus, davidm, Alan Cox
On, or about, April 18, Christopher Yeoh fixed a problem in the
v2.4-kernel where SIGURG got terminated incorrectly, in violation to
SuSv3. I intend to merge this fix into v2.0 as well, unless someone has
any objections.
However, I noticed that kernel/signal.c also contains similar code that
does not contain SIGURG (mangled whitespace):
(on line 1112 or thereabouts)
if (k->sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN
|| (k->sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL
&& (sig == SIGCONT ||
sig == SIGCHLD ||
sig == SIGWINCH))) {
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sigmask_lock);
if (rm_sig_from_queue(sig, current))
recalc_sigpending(current);
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sigmask_lock);
}
Is this intentionally left this way, or did it get missed out by
mistake?!
Regards: David Weinehall
_ _
// David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\
// Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky //
\> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-05-08 20:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-08 20:39 WRT SIGURG incorrectly delivered to process David Weinehall
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®