Re: [BK PATCH] PCI reorg fix

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 11:06:45AM -0700, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> 
> > As a side note, I don't think that any pci_* function should be able to
> > be called by non-pci drivers.  Is it worth spending the time now in 2.5
> > to make these two functions not rely on 'struct pci_dev' and fix up all
> > of the drivers and architectures and documentation to reflect this?
> > Possible names would be alloc_consistent() and free_consistent()?
> 
> I would suggest something like:
> 
> void * 
> dev_alloc_consistent(struct device * dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t * dma_handle);
> 
> and moving dma_mask to struct device. 

That seems reasonable.

> To handle differences in arch-specific implementations, we could have a 
> callback that the generic code calls.
> 
> Implementing the generic code is ~5 minutes work. However, it will break 
> everything. OTOH, it would be the best motivation for modernizing these 
> drivers...

Eeek, the scsi drivers?  They haven't even started moving to the > 2
years old pci interface yet!  :)

greg k-h