From: Jesse Pollard <pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>
To: elladan@eskimo.com, Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ext2 and ext3 block reservations can be bypassed
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 13:07:26 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200205141807.NAA71526@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil> (raw)
>
> A second method was proposed as well - create a file with a hole in it,
> map it, then dirty the pages in the hole and exit. This would not
> require suid.
Actually, the allocation that fills the partition (and goes one over)
should fail. Even if that is only adding a block to the hole, it should
fail. Now if it DOES continue then you have found a bug since it
shouldn't do that.
> This is basically a documentation issue, unless someone wants to go fix
> it. I wouldn't bother myself - it's ext[23] only and not really very
> useful.
>
> The basic problem is this: the documentation states "This is intended to
> allow for the system to continue functioning even if non-priveleged
> users fill up all the space available to them." This states that it's a
> security feature. It does not work as intended - all users are
> privileged to do this - so the documentation should be updated.
There is nothing wrong with the documentation. Though it could have
additions to more clearly explain why. The feature can already be disabled.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesse I Pollard, II
Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil
Any opinions expressed are solely my own.
next reply other threads:[~2002-05-14 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-14 18:07 Jesse Pollard [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-14 19:29 Jesse Pollard
2002-05-14 18:54 Jesse Pollard
2002-05-14 19:04 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-14 19:55 ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-14 18:00 Jesse Pollard
2002-05-14 17:53 Jesse Pollard
2002-05-14 18:23 ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-14 19:11 ` Alexander Viro
[not found] <791836807@toto.iv>
2002-05-12 22:04 ` Peter Chubb
2002-05-12 22:53 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-13 4:22 ` Kasper Dupont
2002-05-13 4:51 ` Elladan
2002-05-12 16:23 Kasper Dupont
2002-05-12 16:42 ` Jakob Østergaard
2002-05-12 17:34 ` Elladan
2002-05-12 18:15 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-12 18:37 ` Elladan
2002-05-12 19:02 ` Jakob Østergaard
2002-05-12 19:04 ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-13 17:09 ` Horst von Brand
2002-05-13 17:52 ` Elladan
2002-05-13 17:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-05-14 16:22 ` Elladan
2002-05-14 16:55 ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-14 17:47 ` Elladan
2002-05-14 18:51 ` Kasper Dupont
2002-05-15 19:48 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-15 20:29 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-14 15:40 ` Kasper Dupont
2002-05-14 15:56 ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-14 18:25 ` Kasper Dupont
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200205141807.NAA71526@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil \
--to=pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil \
--cc=elladan@eskimo.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@mark.mielke.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®