mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Diego Calleja <DiegoCG@teleline.es>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>, torvalds@transmeta.com
Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 20:19:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020517201900.65e90bbc.DiegoCG@teleline.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3038.1021588938@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au>

On Fri, 17 May 2002 08:42:18 +1000
Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> escribió:


So we have a good patch that can make life better for developers and users.

Not to apply it is a *bad* decision. Linus, soon or later, you'll have to
replace the existing kbuild and you know that (it seems you're taking patches about it).

You must have some conflict with Keith, but i don't care about it. So,
if you have to replace the existing kbuild, why re-do it if it's done yet?.

<my suggestions, this doesn't means it's right>

Linus, please tell Keith that he changes kbuild just as you wants, and now. linux
is yours, and you've the right to take this kid of decisions. Leaders are for that.

And Keith, just try to do kbuild just like Linus wants. We'll help you, too. 

But please, we're not to be fools and re-do all the work again. kbuild 2.5 _is_ good
and all of us know that. So, please, please....don't let me think we're being so idiot....



Diego calleja
DiegoCG@teleline.es

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-05-17 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-16 22:42 Keith Owens
2002-05-17  0:10 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-17  3:30   ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-17  7:55     ` Russell King
2002-05-17  8:42     ` Miles Lane
2002-05-17 13:11       ` Dave Jones
2002-05-17 13:09     ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-17  8:17       ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-17 13:39         ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-17  1:50 ` jeff millar
2002-05-17  2:04   ` Keith Owens
2002-05-17  2:26   ` Dave Jones
2002-05-17  7:11 ` Kenneth Johansson
2002-05-17 15:13   ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-17 15:19     ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-17 15:42       ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-18  1:39         ` Keith Owens
2002-05-18  2:11           ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-18  2:19             ` Keith Owens
2002-05-18 22:14               ` Drivers.conf and kbuild-2.5 [Was: kbuild 2.5 is ready ...] Sam Ravnborg
2002-05-18 22:35                 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-19 10:45                   ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-05-17 18:19 ` Diego Calleja [this message]
2002-05-19 15:46 ` kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3 Pavel Machek
2002-05-17 14:21 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 17:37 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-05-17 18:00   ` Robert Love
2002-05-17 14:56 James Bottomley
2002-05-17 19:51 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 20:09 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-17 20:25   ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-18 13:15 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-05-17 20:53 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 21:14 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-17 21:42   ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-17 22:16     ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-05-17 22:34       ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-17 22:40         ` Larry McVoy
2002-05-18  0:41       ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-05-17 22:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-18  0:38 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-05-17 22:59 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 23:14 ` Robert Love
2002-05-18  4:01 ` Horst von Brand
2002-05-18 12:57 ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-18  5:09 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-18  5:23 ` David Lang
2002-05-18 13:11 ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-18  6:05 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-18 16:50 ` John Weber
2002-05-18 10:25 Mike Galbraith
2002-05-18 17:32 ` Wayne.Brown
2002-05-18 18:11   ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-18 21:15   ` DervishD
2002-05-20  4:31   ` Mike Fedyk
2002-05-20  5:09     ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-05-20  5:18       ` Keith Owens
2002-05-20 14:29       ` Juan Quintela
2002-05-20  5:11     ` Keith Owens
2002-05-19 10:26 Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020517201900.65e90bbc.DiegoCG@teleline.es \
    --to=diegocg@teleline.es \
    --cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®