From: Horst von Brand <vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux, the microkernel (was Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken)
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 21:07:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200206220107.g5M17AXp028825@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 21 Jun 2002 22:25:22 +0200." <E17LUyA-0001wU-00@starship>
[Cc:s heavily snipped]
Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de> said:
> On Friday 21 June 2002 20:46, Cort Dougan wrote:
> > I don't see Linux being in serious jeopardy in the short-term of becoming
> > solaris. It only aims at running on 1-4 processors and does a pretty good
> > job of that. Most sane people realize, as Larry points out, that the
> > current design will not scale to 64 processors and beyond. That's obvious,
> > it's not an alarmist or deep statement. The key is to realize that it's
> > not _meant_ to scale that high right now.
>
> And originally, it was never meant to scale to more than one processor.
Right. If they had designed it for 4/8 CPUs from the start, they would
surely have gotten it dead wrong. Just to find out how wrong around now...
If 64-way becomes commodity one day in whatever form the hardware people
dream up, Linux will surely follow.
--
Horst von Brand vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl
Casilla 9G, Vin~a del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-22 1:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-18 17:18 latest linus-2.5 BK broken James Simmons
2002-06-18 17:46 ` Robert Love
2002-06-18 18:51 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-18 18:43 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-18 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-18 18:59 ` Robert Love
2002-06-18 20:05 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-18 20:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-18 20:31 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-18 20:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-18 21:12 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-18 21:08 ` Cort Dougan
2002-06-18 21:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-19 12:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-19 17:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 3:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-20 5:24 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-20 7:26 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-06-20 14:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-20 15:41 ` McVoy's Clusters (was Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken) Sandy Harris
2002-06-20 17:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-20 20:42 ` Timothy D. Witham
2002-06-21 5:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-22 14:14 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-06-20 16:30 ` latest linus-2.5 BK broken Cort Dougan
2002-06-20 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-21 6:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-21 17:50 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-21 17:55 ` Robert Love
2002-06-21 18:09 ` Linux, the microkernel (was Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken) Jeff Garzik
2002-06-21 18:46 ` Cort Dougan
2002-06-21 20:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-22 1:07 ` Horst von Brand [this message]
2002-06-22 1:23 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-22 12:41 ` Roman Zippel
2002-06-23 15:15 ` Sandy Harris
2002-06-23 17:29 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-06-24 6:27 ` Craig I. Hagan
2002-06-24 13:06 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-06-24 10:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-21 19:34 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-22 15:31 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-22 12:24 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-22 19:00 ` Ruth Ivimey-Cook
2002-06-22 21:09 ` jdow
2002-06-23 17:56 ` John Alvord
2002-06-23 20:48 ` jdow
2002-06-23 21:40 ` [OT] " Xavier Bestel
2002-06-22 18:25 ` latest linus-2.5 BK broken Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-22 19:26 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-22 22:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-22 23:10 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-23 6:34 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-23 22:56 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-06-20 17:16 ` RW Hawkins
2002-06-20 17:23 ` Cort Dougan
2002-06-20 20:40 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-20 20:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 21:27 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-20 21:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 21:59 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-20 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 22:41 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-21 0:09 ` Allen Campbell
2002-06-21 7:43 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-21 21:02 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-22 3:57 ` (RFC)i386 arch autodetect( was Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken ) Matthew D. Pitts
2002-06-22 4:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-21 16:01 ` Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken Sandy Harris
2002-06-21 20:38 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-20 21:13 ` Timothy D. Witham
2002-06-21 19:53 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-21 5:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-19 10:21 ` Padraig Brady
2002-06-18 21:45 ` Bill Huey
2002-06-18 20:55 ` Robert Love
2002-06-19 13:31 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-18 19:29 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-18 19:19 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-18 19:49 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-18 19:27 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-18 20:13 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-18 20:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-18 22:03 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200206220107.g5M17AXp028825@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl \
--to=vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillips@arcor.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®