Re: Rusty's module talk at the Kernel Summit

["Adam J. Richter" <adam@yggdrasil.com>]

On Mon Jul  1 10:07:38 PDT 2002, Jim L. Nance wrote;
>On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:12:56AM -0700, Adam J. Richter wrote:
>>       As an extereme illustration, imagine a module with 4095 bytes
>> of non-init data and 2 bytes of init data.  With the .init section loaded,
>> the module will occupy two pages.  Freeing the .init section will free
>> an entire page, making 4096 bytes available to the system, even though
>> only two bytes were in the .init section.
>
>Surly we can do better and just not generate .init sections for modules
>where the size would be smaller than a page.  Is binutils capable of doing
>this given the proper linker script?

	I wasn't talking specifically about modules smaller than a
page in that paragraph.  I was talking about modules where the non-init
section ends toward the end of a page and appending the init
section would make it end more toward the begining of a (different) page.

	I also wasn't talking about modifying binutils.  binutils
already works fine with the present .text.init, .data.init, etc.
sections used in compiled-in kernel .o files (see include/linux/init.h)
I was talking about leaving some of this enabled for modules, and how
insmod could be changed to support it.

Adam J. Richter     __     ______________   575 Oroville Road
adam@yggdrasil.com     \ /                  Milpitas, California 95035
+1 408 309-6081         | g g d r a s i l   United States of America
                         "Free Software For The Rest Of Us."