Re: Pentium IV cache line size

[Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>]

On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 16:58:11 -0400 (EDT), Mark Hahn wrote:
>	- Place each synchronization variable alone, 
>	separated by 128 byte or in a separate cache line.
>
>see also table 1.1.  I'm not sure it matters whether you consider lines 128B
>or 64B; the fact that cacheline reads always happen at 128B is probably
>the dominant concern.  table 1.1 page 7-18 ("placement of shared
>synchonization variable") repeats this.

For SW synchronisation variables this makes sense.

However, I've been in contact with some people doing high-speed routing
with Linux boxes, and they had major performance problems on a dual P4/Xeon.
Somehow, the 128 byte alignment affected how the gigabit NIC driver they
used programmed the NIC, with the effect that buffering of PCI writes
(or something like that, this is from memory) didn't work and performance
dropped like a rock. They manually set the alignment back to 64 bytes in
the NIC driver and performance increased to expected levels.

/Mikael